Information by segment as defined by USBLS

Tracking Pet Food Pricing – The PPI (Mfg) vs CPI (Retail)

Changes in the price manufacturers charge for a product obviously impact the retail price for consumers. However, it is not always a direct correlation and often there is a significant delay in the response. The retailers who sell high demand products like Pet Food are under intense competitive pressure.

In this brief report we will look at how changes in the Producer Price Index (PPI) for Pet Food match up to the changes in the retail CPI from December 2019 to 2022. Pre-pandemic December 2019 is used as the base number in all graphs to facilitate comparisons.

The first graph plots the PPI pricing path of Dog & Cat Food and Other Pet Food vs the Pet Food Retail CPI.

  • Pricing remained essentially stable for all groups through most of 2020. The first change was that the PPI for Non-Dog/Cat Pet Food began moving up in November. This lift has continued but this small category has little impact on overall Pet Food Retail Prices.
  • The Dog & Cat Food PPI moved up sharply in July 2021 then essentially stabilized until the end of the year. This turned Retail Prices up slightly, only +1.6% vs 2019 by December 2021.
  • In 2022, the Dog & Cat PPI turned up in Jan/Feb, stabilized in Mar/Apr, then rose sharply in May. Pet Food Retail prices began growing in February. This increase accelerated in March and continues through May. The Retail inflation rate for Pet Food is now 66% of the PPI increase for Dog & Cat Food. In February it was 31.6% and only 25.4% back in December 2021. This gap is definitely narrowing as the Retail price increases are more closely matching the increase in manufacturing costs. By the way, the increase for Other Pet Foods is a meteoric +31.6% vs 2019. This is huge and by far the biggest increase in any Pet Food category, but it is only 29% of the 109% increase in the Gasoline PPI over the same period.

Obviously, it takes a while for a rise in the PPI to impact retail prices. Also, as we saw in most of 2020 and in the 2nd half of 2021, stability in the PPI usually generates stability in Retail prices.

Dogs & Cats “rule” the pet food segment just like they “rule” the overall Pet Industry. However, the lift in prices for manufacturing Food for Other Pets has now gotten so large that it is having an impact in pushing Pet Food Retail Prices up.

We will now drill a little deeper into the “ruling” Dog & Cat Food categories. We will look at the individual PPI history for Dog Food and Cat Food and the 2 largest sub-categories in each – Dry/Semi-moist and Canned. Our chart will track and compare the Pet Food CPI and the PPI history for all groups from December 2019 to March 2022. The detailed data release for these specific groups is 2 months behind the overall PPI release.

  • The PPI for all categories was essentially unchanged from December 2019 until October 2020. At that time manufacturers’ prices in the Canned Dog Food category moved up 1.1%.
  • In October 2020 Pet Food retail reached bottom in their deflationary movement. The price increase in Canned Dog Food slowed overall Pet Food deflation and essentially stabilized prices.
  • Both the individual PPIs and the overall Pet Food CPI plateaued from November 2020 through May 2021.
  • All prices moved up slightly in June 2021 but the PPIs took off in July. The Pet Food CPI also was above December 2019 for the 1st time since February 2020.
  • Canned Dog Food led the skyrocketing PPI prices in July 2021 but all categories had a significant increase. The increase continued in August, but the CPI unexpectedly dipped slightly below December 2019.
  • The PPIs for all groups essentially stabilized from September through December 2021 while the Pet Food CPI began to increase, especially from Nov>Dec.
  • In January 2022, the PPIs for all but Canned Dog Food turned up again. Their increase continued in February, with Canned Cat Food skyrocketing up to +12.7%, almost equal to the overall increase by Canned Dog Food. The Pet Food CPI moved up slightly in January and then inflation took off in February.
  • The PPIs stabilized again in March, but we should note that prices for Canned Dog Food have been stable since August, after the spectacular Jun>August lift. While manufacturing prices have stabilized, inflation in Pet Food Retail is accelerating. From our 1st chart we know that this trend continued through May.
  • Once again, we see that there is obviously a timing delay from the PPI to the CPI. It takes time for the impact to work its way from manufacturer to retailer to consumer.
  • We also see that the Canned Food categories have significantly more pricing volatility than Dry Food for both Dogs and Cats. While Canned Dog Food led the way in the PPI lift and ended up with the biggest increase, +13.3%, Canned Cat Food finished a close second at +12.7%.
  • However, when you look at how these individual PPIs compare to the overall PPI for Dog or Cat, it is readily apparent that Canned Cat Food has a much larger share of total Cat Food than Canned Dog Food has of Total Dog Food.

In terms of what will happen in the future, we turn again to our first chart. The PPI for Dog/Cat Food was stable through April but turned sharply up again in May. When Mfg prices go up, Distributors & Retailers must take a closer look at their product mix. For those items with increasing prices, they can raise their prices, accept lower margins or some combination of both. The Retail CPI is spiking. It’s likely that rising manufacturing prices will cause Retail Pet Food inflation to continue to grow. We need the PPIs to flatten for the CPI to stop increasing. Ultimately, we hope that any supply chain issues will be fixed, returning Pet Food Retail and Manufacturing to a more price competitive market.

Petflation 2022 – May Update: Prices stay at +8.1% above 2021

Inflation continues to make headlines. There have been year over year increases in the monthly Consumer Price Index (CPI) larger than we have seen in decades. In May the CPI was up 8.6% vs 2021, beating the previous high of 8.5% in March. Food at Home (groceries) prices continue to surge, up 11.9% over 2021. That’s 3 straight months of double-digit YOY monthly percentage increases. These are the first 10+% increases since 1981. As we have seen in recent years, even minor price fluctuations can affect consumer pet spending, especially in the more discretionary pet segments. With that in mind, we will continue to publish monthly reports to track petflation as it evolves in the marketplace.

Total Pet prices were 4.1% higher in December 2021 than in December 2020, while the overall CPI was up 7.0%. The gap narrowed in March & April as Petflation accelerated to 97.6% of the national rate. In May, Inflation in the overall market became stronger. However, thanks to a price drop in Veterinary, Petflation stabilized, and the gap widened – 8.1% for Pet vs 8.6% for the national rate. Let’s look a little deeper. This and future reports will include:

  • A rolling 24 month tracking of the CPI for all pet segments and the national CPI. The base number will be pre-pandemic December 2019 in this and future reports, which will facilitate comparisons.
  • Monthly comparisons of 22 vs 21 which will include Pet Segments and relevant Human spending categories. Plus
    1. CPI change from the previous month
    2. Inflation changes for recent years (20>21, 19>20, 18>19)
    3. Total Inflation for the current month in 2022 vs 2019
    4. Average annual Year Over Year inflation rate from 2019 to 2022
  • YTD comparisons
    1. YTD numbers for the monthly comparisons #2>4 above

In our first graph we will track the monthly change in prices for the 24 months from May 2020 to May 2022. We will use December 2019 as a base number in this and future reports so we can track the progress from pre-pandemic times through an eventual recovery. Inflation is a complex issue. This chart is designed to give you a visual image of the flow of pricing. You can see the similarities and differences in patterns between segments and compare them to the overall U.S. CPI. The current numbers plus those from 12 and 24 months earlier are included as are the yr-end numbers for 2020 & 2021.This will give you some key waypoints for comparisons. (Note: the April Peak for Veterinary is also highlighted.)

The pandemic really hit home in April/May. Even the national CPI deflated for 2 months, but not the Services segments. There are 2 different patterns between the Services and the Products segments. Veterinary and Services prices generally inflated after mid-2020, a pattern similar to the overall CPI. Food and Supplies prices generally deflated until late 2021. After that time, inflation took off, but the patterns became mixed. Services paused in March and Veterinary dropped in May. Supplies prices have essentially plateaued while inflation in Food is accelerating. Here are some things to note:

  • U.S. CPI – The inflation rate was below 2% through 2020. It turned up in January 2021 and continued to grow through May 2022. 65% of the overall 13.7% increase since 2019 occurred in the last 12 months.
  • Pet Food – Prices stayed generally below December 2019 levels from April 2020 to September 2021, when they turned up. There was a sharp increase in December. 90% of the 8.4% increase has happened since November.
  • Pet Supplies – Remember that Supplies prices were high in December 2019 due to the added tariffs. They had a “deflated” roller coaster ride until mid-2021 when they returned to December 2019 prices and essentially stayed there until 2022 when they turned sharply up reaching a new all-time pricing high in January, beating the 2009 record. Prices have essentially plateaued at this new, higher level since February.
  • Pet Services – Normally inflation is 2+%. Perhaps due to closures, prices increased at a lower rate in 2020. In 2021 consumer demand increased but there were fewer outlets. Inflation grew in 2021 with the biggest lift in Jan>Apr. Inflation got stronger in 2022, slowed a little in March, turned up in April and then slowed a bit in May – basically an every other month pattern
  • Veterinary – Inflation has been generally consistent in Veterinary. Prices began rising in March 2020 and increased through 2021. Then a pricing surge began in December which pushed them past the overall CPI with total inflation since 2019 reaching +15.5% in April. In May prices fell but they are still ahead of the National CPI.
  • Total Pet – The blending of the segment patterns made the Pet Industry appear calm compared to the overall market. That ended in December 2021 as prices surged in all segments. In May inflation is slowing in all but Food.

Next, we’ll turn our attention to the Year over Year inflation rate change for the month of May and compare it to last month, last year and to previous years. We’ve added some human categories to put the pet numbers into perspective.

Overall, Prices vs 2021 were up 8.6% vs 2021 with the Grocery increase now hitting 11.9%. There are some small positives. Only 3 of 9 categories had increases over 1% from last month, the same as April but down from 5 in March…. And Veterinary Services prices actually fell 1.0% from April. There is a little hope.

  • U.S. CPI – Prices are up 1.1% from last month. In April the increase was 0.6%. May Inflation was +8.6%. The targeted rate is <2%. We remain 4+ times higher than the “target”. Inflation is getting worse, and it accelerated again in May.
  • Pet Food – Prices are up 1.6% vs April and 9.1% vs May 2021. The YOY increase is being measured against a deflationary year, but that increase is more than triple the pre-pandemic 2.8% increase from 2018 to 2019.
  • Food at Home – Prices are up 1.3% from March. The increase from 2021 is 11.9%, which is the largest increase in any month since 12.3% in April 1979 and the largest May monthly increase since 16.6% in 1974. Inflation for this category since 2019 is the highest of any category on the chart and is 28% more than the national CPI.
  • Pets & Supplies – Prices grew 0.1% from April but they are slightly below March’s record high. They now have the lowest monthly increase over 2021 of any industry segment, and the lowest increase since 2019.
  • Veterinary Services – May prices fell 1.0% from April. They are up 7.4% from 2021 but now trail Pet Food in the Pet Industry. They also lost the lead in the increase since 2019 with 16.9% compared to Food at home at 18.1%.
  • Medical Services – Prices sharply increased at the start of the pandemic in 2020 but then inflation slowed and returned to a more normal rate in 2021. It appears to be turning strongly up again in 2022.
  • Pet Services – Inflation slowed in 2020 but began to grow in 2021 & 2022. Prices are up 0.5% from April and 7.4% from May 2021, beating the record 6.5% increase in February and double the rate of 2019 & 2020. However, we should note that a big part of the record May lift was due to a 0.9% drop in prices from April to May 2021.
  • Haircuts & Other Personal Services – Prices are +0.5% from April and 6.2% from 2021. They are +15.6% since 2019.
  • Total Pet – Inflation is strong and is 3+ times the rate of last year. Veterinary prices fell and Supplies prices plateaued which helped keep overall Petflation steady at +8.1%. In the past, inflation has caused a reduction in the frequency of purchase in Supplies, Services and Veterinary. Super Premium Food has been generally immune as consumers are used to paying big bucks and it is needed every day. We’ll see if consumers are willing to pay the new high prices for food and buy the more discretionary products/services at the same frequency as they did in the past.

Now here’s a look at Year-to-Date numbers. How does 2022 compare to previous years…so far?

The increase from 2021 to 2022 is the biggest for 7 of 9 categories. The average annual increase since 2019 is over 3% for all but Pet Food & Pet Supplies. This is due to deflation in 2021.

  • U.S. CPI – The current increase is double the average increase from 2019>2022, but over 4 times the average annual increase from 2018>2021. Inflation is a big problem that started recently.
  • Pet Food – Inflation is growing stronger, especially after deflation in 2021.
  • Food at Home – The 2022 YTD inflation beat the U.S. CPI by 19.5%. You can see the impact of supply chain issues.
  • Pets & Pet Supplies – Prices have plateaued at a new record level since February. Although the 2021>22 increase is being measured against a deflationary 2021, it is very significant and 2nd to Veterinary in the Pet Industry segments.
  • Veterinary Services – Has the most inflation since 2019 and is the only segment on the chart with a 3+% inflation rate each year throughout the pandemic and recovery. No matter what, just charge more.
  • Medical Services – Prices went up significantly at the beginning of the pandemic, but the rate has slowed since and has now essentially returned to near pre-pandemic levels.
  • Pet Services – February set a record for the biggest year over year monthly increase in history. The rate slowed in March, turned up again in April then set a new record in May. The current YTD increase of 6.1% remains 2nd only to 6.4% in 2009. Demand has grown for Pet Services while the availability has decreased, a formula for inflation.
  • Haircuts & Personal Services – The services segments, essential & non-essential were hit hardest by the pandemic. After a small decrease in March, prices turned up in April/May. The YTD rate is now down slightly from 2020>21 but still 79% more than 2018>19. Consumers are paying 14.9% more than in 2019. This usually reduces the frequency.
  • Total Pet – When we first looked at the pandemic impact on Petflation. We saw basically two different patterns. Prices in the Services segments continued to increase, and the rate accelerated as we moved into 2021. The product segments – Food and Supplies, were on a different path. They generally deflated in 2020 and didn’t return to 2019 levels until mid-year 2021. Food prices began a slow increase, but Supplies remained stable until we neared yearend. In 2022, everything changed as Food and Supplies prices turned sharply up. Food prices continued to climb as Supplies pricing stabilized and Veterinary prices dropped. The net was a YTD CPI increase vs 2021 for Total Petflation of 6.7%, 82% of the extraordinarily high 8.2% overall rate. It was only 72.5% of the National rate in March.

Inflation is strong in the Pet Market. Will it impact spending? Let’s put it into perspective. The 6.7% YTD increase in Total Pet is far below the 9.6% record set in 2009 but 4 times larger than the 1.5% avg since then. Although pet spending continues to move to higher income groups, the impact of inflation varies by segment. Supplies is the most affected as many categories are price sensitive. Super Premium Food has become widespread because the perceived value has grown. Higher prices just push people to value shop. Veterinary prices have strongly inflated for years, resulting in a reduction in visit frequency. Spending in the Services segment is driven by higher incomes, so inflation is less impactful. Hopefully, Supplies prices will stabilize and begin to deflate. Eliminating the special tariffs implemented in September 2018 would be a big help. However, we’ll just have to wait and see the impact of the continued strong Petflation.

2020 Veterinary Spending was $24.85B – Where did it come from…?

Now we will turn our attention to the final Industry Segment – Veterinary Services. For years, Veterinary Services prices have had high inflation. This has resulted in CU income becoming the most dominant factor in spending behavior and a reduction in visit frequency. Consumers paid more, just used Veterinary Services less often.

Things changed in 2017 as low inflation spurred a 7.2% increase in visit frequency and a $2.5B increase in spending. In 2018 inflation returned to more normal levels. Consumers spent $0.56B more (+2.7%). However, the inflation rate was 2.6% so virtually all of the lift was from increased prices. In 2019 the situation got worse. Consumers spent $0.58B (+2.7%) more but inflation was 4.14%. This means that there was an actual decrease in the amount of Veterinary Services purchased. In 2020 the pandemic hit and consumers concentrated on needs. For Pet Parents, that meant that they became focused on Pet Food & Veterinary Services. As a result, Veterinary spending grew $3.05B, (+14.0%).

We’ll start our analysis with the groups who were responsible for the bulk of Veterinary spending in 2020 and the $3.05B increase. The first chart details the biggest pet Veterinary spenders for each of 10 demographic categories. It shows their share of CU’s, share of Veterinary spending and their spending performance (Share of spending/share of CU’s). In terms of performance – 6 of 10 groups perform above 120%, the same as 2018 & 2019. This is more than Supplies & Services with 5 but much less than Food (8). This means that these big spenders are performing well but it also signals that there is still a large disparity between the best and worst performing demographics in the “needed” segments. Income remains the biggest factor in Veterinary Spending, but Education is also important as College Grads is a different group from Total Pet. The categories are in the order that reflects their share of Total Pet $.

  1. Race/Ethnic – White, not Hispanic (87.2%) down from 90.9%. This group accounts for the vast majority of spending in every segment, but they lost significant share in 2020. Their 127.5% performance is also down from 132.6% and they fell from 2nd to 3rd in importance in Veterinary Spending but still reflects the spending disparity. Minorities did narrow the gap in 2020. Hispanics & African Americans spent 50% more while the spending by Asians almost tripled.
  2. Housing – Homeowners (83.1%) down from 83.2% Homeownership is a major factor in pet ownership and spending in all industry segments. In terms of importance to Veterinary spending, their 126.3% performance rating is down from 130.5%, but they held on to 4th place. The slight decrease in share and performance came from a bigger % increase from Renters as they fell in numbers while homeownership grew. We should note that Homeownership is not as important to Veterinary Spending as it once was. In 2015 their share was 88.4% with performance of 141.8%.
  3. # in CU– 2+ people (77.9%) up from 75.0% This group, which is 70% of U.S. CUs, gained share and their performance grew from 107.4% to 111.0%. Their rank in terms of importance in Veterinary Spending moved up from last to 8th. Spending by Singles and 4 person CUs was flat while 2, 3 & 5 person CUs had big gains.
  4. Area – Suburban & Rural (67.1%) down from 68.7% Suburban CU’s are the biggest spenders in every segment. Rural had a great year and was added to hit the 60% goal. Performance still fell to 106.4%, from 107.9%. The decreases in share and performance came because Suburbs 2500> were up only 3.2% while Center City was +19.8%.
  5. # Earners – “Everyone Works” (69.7%) down from 70.4% In this group, all adults in the CU are employed. Their Performance fell from 121.5% to 120.3% and they fell in rank from #5 to #6. Only No Earner, Singles spent less. The small drop in share and performance were due to a huge lift by 2+ People CUs with 1 or no earner.
  6. CU Composition – Married Couples (58.6%) up from 57.0% Their performance also grew to 120.8% from 116.7% and they returned to the 120+% club at #6. Until 2019, Married Couples had a 60+% market share and 120+% performance in all segments. Only Married Couples with an oldest child <6 spent less. The gains came because the spending by singles was essentially flat, only +0.6%.
  7. Income – Over $70K (63.4%) down from 66.3% The performance of the $70K> group fell significantly from 159.8% to 145.8%. However, higher income is still the most important factor in increased Vet spending. Only the $50>99K group spent less. The spending by the <$50K group grew by 37.0%. Those making $100K> also spent 16.4% more. The key factor in the big changes in share and performance was a 9.8% drop by the $70>99K group.
  8. Age – 35>64 (60.1%) down from 63.2% Their performance also fell from 120.7% to 112.7% and they dropped out of the 120% club. Only <25 & 35>44 yr olds spent less. All other groups had double digit % increases. The drop by 35>44 yr-olds in conjunction with a 52.1% lift by 25>34 caused the big loss in share and performance.
  9. Education – College Grads (61.3%) down from 63.9% Income generally increases with education. It is also important in understanding the need for regular Veterinary care. Performance also fell from 144.1% to 131.2%. Education lost share and performance but moved up to 2nd from 3rd in importance. Only those without a HS diploma spent less. The big drop in share and performance came from a 48.2% lift by HS Grads without a BA/BS. Veterinary Services are very important. The pandemic caused this need to become recognized by more education levels.
  10. Occupation – All Wage & Salaried (68.1%) up from (67.3%) but their performance only increased from 110.3% to 110.7%. Tech/Sls/Clerical and Retirees spent less while most of the lift was driven by Managers & Professionals. However, the largest percentage increase was from the Self-Employed. This combination slowed the gains. It also reinforces that “the bosses” ruled in 2020.

Spending did become a little more balanced but Higher income remains the biggest single factor in Veterinary spending. We see the impact of this in many groups as it often contributes to the big spending disparity between segments. The most notable change was that the 35>64 age group fell out of the 120+% club due to a big lift by the 25>34 yr olds.

Now, we’ll look at 2020’s best and worst performing Veterinary spending segments in each category.

Almost all of the best and worst performers are those that we would expect. However, there are 7 that are different from 2019. This is the same as Services but much more than the 3 in Supplies and much less than the 10 in Food. This suggests some spending turmoil. The changes from 2019 are “boxed”. We should note:

  • Income – The winner & losers are the expected groups but they are 30% closer together.
  • Earners – New, but not unexpected, winner and loser. They have the highest and lowest incomes.
  • Occupation – Once again, it’s all about income
  • Age – The highest income group, 45>54 yr-olds returned to the top. Despite a strong showing by the 25>34 group, only those from 35>74 perform above 100%.
  • Race/Ethnic; Education; Housing – The usual winners and losers but the performance gap narrowed a bit.
  • Area – A fundamental change in the loser based upon population. Last year it was Rural. This year it’s Center City.
  • Region – After winning for 5 straight years, the Northeast was replaced by the West at the top. The West is also the only region performing above 100%. The South has now finished last for 5 years in a row.
  • CU Composition – No change here but again the performance gap narrowed a little, 10%.
  • # in CU – Only 2 & 3 person Cu’s perform above 100%. We have seen spending movement to larger CUs. This is very apparent in Veterinary as the 5+ group spent 67% more and moved up a little after 2 years at the bottom.
  • Generation – The loser flipped from the oldest to the youngest and the performance gap widened by 30%.

It’s time to “Show you the money”. Here are segments with the biggest $ changes in Veterinary Spending.

We saw some turmoil in performance. There was even more here. There were 4 repeats and 10 segments flipped from 1st to last or vice versa. Last year they had 8 repeats and 4 flips. There were some surprise winners – 25>34 yr-olds & Center City but no surprise losers. In fact, in 4 categories all segments spent more. You should also note the increases were significantly larger than the decreases and 85% of 96 demographic segments spent more. Here are the specifics:

  • Occupation – The winner and loser flipped with the “Bosses” returning to the top.
    • Winner – Mgrs & Professionals– Veterinary Spending: $9.87B; Up $2.11B (+27.1%)                      2019: Tech/Sales/Clerical
    • Loser – Tech/Sales/Clerical – Veterinary Spending: $3.42B; Down $0.27B (-7.4%)                          2019: Mgrs & Profess.
    • Comment – The highest income groups – Self-Employed and Mgrs & Professionals accounted for 90% of the increase. Blue Collar workers did spend $0.41B more but Retirees spent a little less, -0.04B (-1.0%).
  • Region – The Northeast flipped from 1st to last. They have now flipped for 3 consecutive years.
    • Winner – West – Veterinary Spending: $7.01B; Up $2.08B (+42.1%)                                                    2019: Northeast
    • Loser – Northeast – Veterinary Spending: $4.10B; Down $0.98B (-19.3%)                                         2019: Midwest
    • Comment – The South finished 2nd for the 4th consecutive year. All but the Northeast had double digit % gains.
  • Race/Ethnic – Both groups held their spots as White, non-Hispanics maintained their dominance in this segment.
    • Winner – White, Not Hispanic – Veterinary: $21.67B; Up $1.85B (+9.3%)                                       2019: White, Not Hispanic
    • Loser – African American – Veterinary: $0.87B; Up $0.30B (+51.8%)                                               2019: African Americans
    • Comment– In 2019 only African Americans spent less. In 2020 everyone spent more. This shows that Pet Parents’ commitment to the health & wellbeing of their Pet Children is widespread across all racial/ethnic groups.
  • Housing – Homeowners w/Mtges held their position at the top.
    • Winner – Homeowner w/Mtge – Veterinary: $14.06B; Up $1.62B (+13.0%)                                    2019: Homeowner w/Mtge
    • Loser – Renter – Veterinary: $4.19B; Up $0.53B (+14.5%)                                                                      2019: Homeowner w/o Mtge
    • Comment – Every segment spent more and in fact, Homeowners w/Mtges had the lowest percentage increase. They won because they account for 56.6% of all Veterinary spending.
  • # in CU – Both the winner and loser flipped.
    • Winner – 2 People – Veterinary Spending: $9.73B; Up $1.50B (+18.3%)                                              2019: 1 Person
    • Loser – 1 Person – Veterinary Spending: $5.48B; Up $0.03B (+0.6%)                                                   2019: 2 People
    • Comment: Again, all groups spent more. 4 Person CUs and singles had increases under 2% while everyone else was in double digits, led by 5+ CUs who were up 67%.
  • Generation – Baby Boomers flipped from last to first as they focused on their Pets’ needs – Food & Veterinary.
    • Winner – Baby Boomers – Veterinary: $8.93B; Up $1.45B (+19.4%)                                                  2019: Millennials
    • Loser – Gen Z – Veterinary: $0.20B; Down $0.06B (-22.5%)                                                                  2019: Baby Boomers
    • Comments – After 2 years at the bottom Boomers returned to the top. Millennials also had a good year, +$1.1B. Gen Z was the only generation to spend less.
  • Area Type – Center City is a bit of a surprise and the big suburbs flipped from 1st to last.
    • Winner – Center City – Veterinary Spending: $8.17B; Up $1.35B (+19.8%)                                       2019: Suburbs 2500>
    • Loser – Suburbs 2500> – Veterinary Spending: $11.57B; Up $0.36B (+3.2%)                                   2019: Suburbs <2500
    • Comment – All groups also spent more. The question became “How much more?” With 33% of the $ and a 20% increase, Center City won. Suburbs 2500> have 47% of $ but were only +3%. By the way, Rural was +80%.
  • CU Composition – Married Couple Only flipped from last to 1st.
    • Winner – Married, Couple Only – Veterinary: $7.04B; Up $1.31B (+22.9%)                                2019: Singles
    • Loser – Married, Oldest Child <6 – Veterinary: $0.95B; Down $0.21B (-18.2%)                          2019: Married, Couple Only
    • Comment – After a $0.72B increase in 2019, the loser was the only segment to spend less. Single Parents spent 68% more but 63% of the total $ increase came from Married Couples Only and those with a child over 18.
  • # Earners – Both the winner and loser are new, but not surprising.
    • Winner – 3+ Earners – Veterinary Spending: $3.26B; Up $1.15B (+54.2%)                                     2019: 2 Earners
    • Loser – No Earner, Single – Veterinary Spending: $1.45B; Down $0.51B (-26.1%)                        2019: 1 Earner, 2+ CU
    • Comment – The winner and loser have the highest and lowest incomes and No Earner, Singles were the only group to spend less. Income is of primary importance to increased Veterinary Spending & # of earners is important. However, not every adult has to work. 1 Earner, 2+ Person CUs was only beaten by $0.03B.
  • Income – $100>149K flipped from last to first.
    • Winner – $100>149K – Veterinary Spending: $5.04B; Up $1.14B (+29.1%)                                    2019: <$30K
    • Loser – $70>99K – Veterinary Spending: $3.74B; Down $0.41B (-9.8%)                                          2019: $100>149K
    • Comment – Two groups spent less, $50>69K & $70>99K. Last year we had a definite spending rollercoaster. It’s still here in 2020, but with bigger groups. <$50K: +$1.82B; $50>99K: -$0.48B; $100K>: +$1.69B.
  • Age – In a bit of a surprise, the 25>34 yr-olds won while 35>44 flipped from 1st to last.
    • Winner – 25>34 yrs – Veterinary Spending: $3.74B; Up $1.11B (+42.2%)                                       2019: 35>44 yrs
    • Loser – 35>44 yrs – Veterinary Spending: $4.47B; Down $0.59B (-11.6%)                                       2019: 45>54 yrs
    • Comment: Two groups spent less, the 35>44 yr-olds and the <25 group. Everyone else had double digit percentage increases. The 25>34 group is only 4th in income and 5th in Veterinary spending performance so their win is unexpected. Apparently, they were motivated by the pandemic. Their Services $ were flat but they spent a lot more in all other segments.
  • Education – Those with an Advanced College Degree held their spot at the top.
    • Winner – Adv. College Degree – Veterinary Spending: $7.41B; Up $0.88B (+13.4%)                 2019: Adv. College Degree
    • Loser – <High School Grads – Veterinary Spending: $0.34B; Down $0.14B (-29.4%)                2019: Associates Degree
    • Comment – Only those without a HS Diploma spent less. College grads were up $1.29B (+9.3%). However, those with a HS Diploma but not a BA/BS spent $1.89B (+25.6%) more so the lift was widespread.

We’ve now seen the winners and losers in terms of increase/decrease in Veterinary Spending $ for 12 Demographic Categories. The 2020 pandemic brought strong  growth in Veterinary spending. However, there was some turmoil as only 4 segments held their spot from 2019 while 10 flipped from first to last or vice versa, but with almost no surprising winners. The surprise was in how widespread the spending lift was. In 4 categories, no segments spent less and overall, 85% of all demographic segments spent more. This means that there were “hidden” segments that didn’t win but made a significant contribution to the $3B increase. These groups don’t win an award, but they certainly deserve….

HONORABLE MENTION

Center City won but Rural came in second – the opposite ends of the population spectrum. Income matters as Self-Employed finished 2nd to Managers & Professionals. However, spending became a little more balanced in both Income & Education which is reflected by the performance of the $30>39K, 1 Earner, 2+CU and HS Grads w/some College groups. It also wasn’t all about Baby Boomers and Gen X. The younger Millennials certainly stood up with a $1B increase in spending. There are many more groups that could be included as 82 of 96 segments (85%) spent more on Veterinary Services. That is significantly better than 57% in 2019 and 63% in 2018. 2020 was a good year!

Summary

2016 and 2017 produced a combined increase of $3.6B in Veterinary Spending as inflation moved to record low levels. In 2018 we had the Baby Boomer Spending “Bust” which especially impacted Food and Veterinary. The Boomers spending continued to fall in 2019. Fortunately, Gen X and Millennials stepped up to produce a small. 2.7% increase in both years. In 2020 the pandemic focused Pet Parents on the needed segments. This drove a $3B increase in Veterinary $. Boomers & Millennials led the way, but the lift was widespread as 85% of demographic segments spent more.

There was some turmoil in the segment, but the net result is that spending became a little more balanced in most demographic categories. In general, the size of the increases far exceeded the size of the decreases. In fact, in 4 categories all segments increased spending. Income and Education remain of primary importance in terms of increased spending.

Income: Performance generally increases with income and reaches it’s highest level, nearly 200% at $150K>. The “halfway” point (50%) occurred at $70>99K in 2020. This is the 1st time that the halfway point has fallen below $100K. Spending may be more balanced, but you can see that there is still a huge disparity.

Higher Education: Performance increases with Education but doesn’t reach 100% until you have a BA/BS degree. The performance of HS Grads with an Associate Degree or at least some college is now over 90%. Those with a College Degree perform at 131%. The disparity is not as bad as Income but still big. Equality in both categories is a long way off.

The performance of other big spending groups is also very important in the Veterinary segment. We identified six demographic categories with high performing large groups. (There were 5 for Supplies and Services but 8 for Food).  Consumers have no control over Race/Ethnicity but in addition to Income and Education, Homeownership, # Earners & Marriage are also important factors in Veterinary spending. All groups but Marriage are tied to income and their high performance demonstrates that there are still big spending disparities among segments within these categories.

There were some changes of note. Marriage returned to prominence while a strong year by the 25>34 yr-olds drove the performance of the 35>64 age group significantly down.

In 2019 Veterinary spending increased +2.7% while prices rose 4.14% – a net decrease in the amount of Services. In 2020 spending grew +14.0% while inflation was 3.7%. That’s over 10% in real growth, a very positive situation. Also, although Boomers and Millennials drove the lift, increases were widespread across demographics making Veterinary spending more balanced. In 2021, the overall U.S. economy has largely recovered. We’ll see if Pet Parents continue to spend heavily on Veterinary Services.

Finally – The “Ultimate” Veterinary Services Spending Consumer Unit consists of 3 people – a married couple and their 18 yr old child. They are 45 to 54 years old. They are White, but not of Hispanic origin. At least one of them has an Adv. College Degree. Both are Mgrs/Professionals and their child also works. Their total income is $150>$200K. They live in a small suburb, adjacent to a big city in the Western U.S. and are still paying off the mortgage on their home.

2020 Pet Services Spending was $6.89B – Where did it come from…?

Next, we will look at Pet Services. It is by far the smallest Segment and after a $1.73B, 20.1% decrease, it got a lot smaller and returned to the level of 2016 – 2017. After the great recession, Services’ annual spending slowly but steadily increased. During this time, the number of outlets offering Services strongly grew as brick ‘n mortar retailers looked for a way to combat the growing influence of online outlets. After all, you can certainly buy products, but you can’t get your dog groomed on the Internet. This created a highly price competitive market for Pet Services. In 2017 there was a slight increase in visit frequency, but Pet Parents just paid less. This resulted in a 1.0% decrease in Services spending. In 2018 consumer behavior changed as a significant number decided to take advantage of the increased availability and convenience of Pet Services and spending literally took off, +$1.95B (+28.9%), by far the biggest increase in history. In 2019 Pet Parents, especially the younger ones, value shopped, and spending turned down $0.10B. That brought us to 2020 and the onset of the pandemic. Because Services outlets were often deemed nonessential, they were subject to restrictions and closures. This drove the huge drop in spending.

We’ve seen that the pandemic caused binge buying in Food, while it slowed the more discretionary Supplies segment. Services  spending is arguably the most discretionary of any Pet Expenditure. Let’s look deeper into 2020 demographics.

Let’s start by identifying the groups most responsible for the bulk of Services spending in 2020 and the $1.73B decrease. The first chart details the biggest Pet Services spenders for each of 10 demographic categories. It shows their share of CU’s, share of Services spending and their spending performance (Share of spending/share of CU’s). In order to better target the bulk of the spending we had to alter the groups in two categories – education and area. The performance level should also be noted as 5 of 10 groups have a performance level above 120%. This is the same as Supplies and Total Pet but less than the 6 for Veterinary and far less than the 8 for Food. Last year they also had only 5 over 120%, down from their peak of 7 in 2018. This indicates that there continues to be a little less disparity between the best and worst performing segments in 2020. Although performance is down from 2019, Income is still the biggest factor in Services Spending. The categories are presented in the order that reflects their share of Total Pet $ which highlights the differences of the 8 matching groups. One big difference is that higher education is a much bigger factor in Services $.

  1. Race/Ethnic – White, not Hispanic (87.9%) up from 87.3%.This big group accounts for the vast majority of spending in every segment. Services Spending became slightly less diverse in terms of race and ethnicity in 2020 as their performance grew from 127.4% to 128.5% and they remained in 4th place in terms of importance.
  2. Housing – Homeowners (78.3%) down from 84.5%. Homeownership is a big factor in spending in all industry segments. The Homeowners’ share of Services fell to the lowest level of any segment in 2020. Their performance plummeted from 132.6% to 119.3% and they dropped out of the 120+% club. Plus, Renters spent 10.5% more.
  3. # in CU – 2+ people (78.3%) up from 75.9% The share for 2+ CU’s is over 75% for all segments and Services is now 2nd to Food’s 82.5%. Their performance also increased from 108.7% to 111.6% and they moved up to 8th from 9th in importance. Only 4 person CUs spent more. 2+ CUs primarily gained ground because Singles had a 50% bigger drop.
  4. Area – City/Suburbs >2500 (83.3%) down from 87.1% in share, while performance fell from 106.9% to 102.7%, last place. Services is an Urban Segment so it makes sense that they would be the most impacted by pandemic related restrictions and closures. Led by Rural, the areas under 2500 population actually spent more on Services.
  5. # Earners – “Everyone Works” (69.9%) up from (67.6%) All adults in the CU are employed. Income is important so a high market share is expected. Their performance grew to 122.0% from 115.6% and they rejoined the 120% club at #5. Only CUs with 3+ Earners spent more. However, when all adults in a CU work, Services become more needed.
  6. CU Composition – Married Couples (62.8%) up from 61.4%. Married couples are a big share of $ and have 120+% performance in all segments. Their performance increased to 129.4% from 125.7% and they moved up from 5th to 3rd in terms of importance to Services spending. In 2020, kids were the key. Only Married Couples with children over 6 and Single Parents spent more.
  7. Income – Over $70K (69.2%) down from 75.0% This group’s performance rating is 159.2%, down markedly from 180.7%. However, CU income is still the single most important factor in increased Pet Services Spending. Only the $50>69K and $150>199K income groups spent more. With a $ drop due to closures and restrictions, it’s to be expected that the group that spent the most pre-pandemic would shoulder the brunt of the negative impact.
  8. Age – 35>64 (62.5%) up from 61.2%. Their performance grew minimally from 117.0% to 117.1% All age groups spent less. The <35 group had the smallest drop, -$0.06B. The 35>64 yr-olds spent -$0.97B less and the $ for 65+ fell -$0.70. The big drop by the oldsters combined with the small drop by the youngsters kept things on par with 2019.
  9. Education – College Grads (68.5%) down from 72.2% Income generally increases with education. Services spending moves up with each increasing level of education. College Grads spend the most so they were most impacted by the pandemic. Performance fell from 162.6% to 146.6% but a college education is still the 2nd most important factor.
  10. Occupation– All Wage & Salaried (66.8%) down from 69.8% – Only Self-Employed spent more. All white and blue collar work groups along with Retirees had a 20+% drop in Services’ spending. As expected, the high income Managers & Professionals who regularly spend the most on Services had the biggest drop, -$0.76B. All Wage & Salaried workers’ performance rating decreased from 114.5% to 108.7%. Services spending became a little more balanced in terms of Occupation but for the wrong reason.

We changed 2 of the groups for Services – Education and Area, to better target the biggest spenders. We should also note that Income is still more important to spending in Services than in any other segment but # Earners was the only income related category to gain in importance. Marriage also grew in importance but spending became a little more balanced in most categories with gains by renters and larger CUs.

Now, we’ll look at 2020’s best and worst performing Pet Services spending segments in each category.

Most of the best and worst performers are not a surprise. There are 7 that are different from 2019 – 3 of the best and 4 of the worst, the same as last year. The 3 new winners are more family oriented. The high income Gen Xers, including 45>54 yr-olds stayed on top but you can see a move away from the oldest Americans. 75+ yr-olds, those Born before 1946 and No Earner, singles all moved to the bottom. Changes from 2019 are “boxed”. We should note:

  • Income is even more important to Pet Services. While the 283.8% Performance by the $150K> group is about the same as last year’s 284.3%, it is still the best performance by any group in any Industry segment.
  • # Earners – Winner and loser are new. They are the segments with the highest and lowest incomes. Not a surprise.
  • Generation – Gen X retained Top Spot and the oldest group, born before 1946 replaced Millennials at the bottom. Gen X had the only 100+% performance but the younger groups all improved while the older groups lost ground.
  • Age – 45>54, the highest income group. is by far the best performer. All groups from 25>64 perform at 100+%. The lowest performers were at both ends of the age spectrum.
  • Area –Suburbs 2500> kept the lead in $ and performance. Services is an Urban segment but the gap narrowed a bit in 2020. Suburbs 2500> performed at 109.3, up from 106.9%. Areas <2500 performed at 88.3%, up from 69.6%.
  • CU Composition – Children mattered in 2020. Married couples with children and even Single Parents spent more on Services. Marriage is the key. Married Couples only and those with children of any age all perform over 100%.

In Pet Services spending performance, income is still the major factor. After the youth movement in 2018, spending skewed towards older groups in 2019. This was reversed in 2020 as the younger groups basically held their ground while the older CUs drove the big decrease.

It’s time to “Show you the money”. Here are segments with the biggest $ changes in Pet Services Spending.

The pandemic closures and restrictions drove Pet Services Spending down $1.73B. In this chart you immediately see a difference from last year. In 2020 there were 3 categories in which all segments spent less on Services. In 2019, there were none. In 2019 the changes by the winner and loser tended to cancel the other out. In 2020, the changes by the losers were radically larger than the winners. The tumult that began in 2019 continued in 2020. Again, there were only 2 repeats and 8 of 24 segments switched from first to last or vice versa. In 2019 there were 9 flips. Here are the specifics:

  • # in CU – Both the winner and loser are new.
    • Winner – 4 People – Pet Services Spending: $1.19B; Up $0.15B (+14.2%)                                  2019: 5+ People
    • Loser – 2 People – Pet Services Spending: $2.49B; Down $1.10B (-30.6%)                                2019: 3 People
    • Comment: The winners in both 2019 and 2020 reflect the growing strength of the younger generations.
  • CU Composition – Married, oldest child 6>17 kept their spot at the top.
    • Winner – Married, Oldest Child 6>17 – Services: $1.31B; Up $0.15B (+12.5%)                       2019: Married, Oldest Child 6>17
    • Loser – Married, Couple Only – Services: $1.80B; Down $0.95B (-34.6%)                                2019: Married, Oldest Child <6
    • Comment – This reflects the strength of the 25>54 year olds. It also demonstrates the importance of “family”, especially children. All married groups with children over 6 spent more. The loser was more likely to be older.
  • Housing – Renters flipped from last to first and were the only segment to spend more.
    • Winner – Renter – Services: $1.48B; Up $0.14B (+10.5%)                                                                  2019: Homeowner w/o Mtge
    • Loser – Homeowner w/Mtge – Services: $3.80B; Down $1.16B (-23.4%)                                      2019: Renter
    • Comment – Homeowners w/mtge spend the most so they have the most to lose and they did.
  • Occupation – Mgrs & Professionals, the biggest Services spenders were again the group with the biggest decrease.
    • Winner–– Self-Employed – Pet Services Spending: $0.71B; Up $0.14B (+24.3%)                          2019: Retired
    • Loser – Mgrs & Professionals – Pet Services Spending: $2.79B; Down $0.76B (-21.4%)             2019: Mgrs & Profess.
    • Comment – The highest income Self-Employed group spent more in every industry segment.
  • Area Type – Big Suburbs flipped from 1st to last. It’s the 1st time since 2016 that Center City didn’t either win or lose.
    • Winner – Rural – Pet Services Spending: $0.38B; Up $0.13B (+50.7%)                                            2019: Suburbs 2500>
    • Loser – Suburbs 2500> – Pet Services Spending: $3.33B; Down $0.95B (-22.2%)                        2019: Center City
    • Comment – Rural was the only group to spend more on Services but they increased spending in all segments.
  • Income – The winner flipped from last to first.
    • Winner – $50 to $69K – Pet Services Spending: $0.74B; Up $0.12B (+18.6%)                                2019: $30>39K
    • Loser – $100 to $149K – Pet Services Spending: $1.19B; Down $0.79B (-40.0%)                            2019: $50 to $69K
    • Comment – Last year we had an up/down spending rollercoaster in income groups. In 2020 only $50>69K & $150>199K spent more. The winning $50>69K group only spent more on Services. The losing group cut back on the more discretionary Supplies and Services to help fund their $9.6B increase in Food & Veterinary.
  • Generation – Gen Z is a surprise, but they had an increase because many are just beginning as Pet Parents.
    • Winner – Gen Z – Services: $0.13B; Up $0.07B (+118.8%)                                                                    2019: Born <1946
    • Loser – Boomers – Services: $2.19B; Down $0.59B (-21.3%)                                                                2019: Gen X
    • Comment – Boomers had the biggest decrease, but it was only slightly larger than Gen X or those born before 1946. Gen Z spent more but the drop by Millennials was minimal, only -$0.16B, 9% of the total decrease.
  • Education – College Degree flipped from 1st to last.
    • Winner – HS Grads – Pet Services Spending: $3.30B; Up $0.05B (+8.9%)                                        2019: Adv. College Degree
    • Loser – Adv. College Degree – Services Spending: $0.93B; Down $1.04B (-31.7%)                        2019: HS Grad w/some College
    • Comment – Only those with no college courses, including those w/o a high school diploma spent more. They only account for 10.6% of Services $ but that’s up significantly from 7.4% in 2019.
  • # Earners– Like the Occupation category, the 2 highest income groups provided both the winner and the loser.
    • Winner – 3+ Earners – Pet Services Spending: $0.57B; Up $0.04B (+56.0%)                                  2019: No Earner, Single
    • Loser – 2 Earners – Pet Services Spending: $2.25B; Down $0.85B (-14.4%)                                     2019: 1 Earner, Single
    • Comment – All but 3+ Earner CUs spent less. No Earner, Singles had the biggest % decrease, -44.7%.
  • Race/Ethnic – Both the 2019 winner and loser flipped.
    • Winner – Hispanic – Services: $0.52B; Down $0.01B (-2.6%)                                                            2019: White, Not Hispanic
    • Loser – White, Not Hispanic – Services: $6.06B; Down $1.47B (-19.6%)                                        2019: Hispanic
    • Comment– All groups spent less. Hispanics are 2nd in spending but the total minority share of Services $ is 12.1%.
  • Age – The 75+ yr olds flipped from 1st to last.
    • Winner – <25 yrs – Pet Services Spending: $0.16B; Down $0.03B (-14.3%)                                     2019: 75+ yrs
    • Loser – 75+ yrs – Pet Services Spending: $0.34B; Down $0.42B (-55.1%)                                           2019: 35>44 yrs
    • Comment: In 2018, all age groups spent more on Services. In 2019 all groups under 45 yrs old spent less, while all groups over 45 spent more. In 2020 all age groups spent less but the <35 group was down only -$0.06B while the 35>64 yr olds were -$0.97B and the 65+ group spent -$0.7B less.
  • Region – The Midwest lost and has now flipped for three consecutive years.
    • Winner – South – Pet Services Spending: $2.65B; Down $0.30B (-10.2%)                                       2019: Midwest
    • Loser – Midwest – Pet Services Spending: $1.23B; Down $0.59B (-32.5%)                                       2019: Northeast
    • Comment – In 2018 all regions spent more. In 2019 it was only the Midwest and West. In 2020 all spent less.

We’ve seen the winners and losers in terms of change in Services Spending $ for 12 Demographic Categories. Income still matters and the younger groups, especially those with children have come to the forefront. Spending has become more balanced but for the wrong reasons. Here’s some data which shows the monumental change from the 2018 peak.

  • Sales:
    • 2018: $8.72B
    • 2019: $8.62B
    • 2020: $6.89B
  • % Segments Spending More:
    • 2018: 88%
    • 2019: 49%
    • 2020: 21%
  • Avg Biggest Increase:
    • 2018: $1.04B
    • 2019: $0.25B
    • 2020: $0.05B
  • Avg Biggest Decrease:
    • 2018: -$0.02B
    • 2019: -$0.27B
    • 2020: -$0.89B

We found the winners in performance and $, but there were others who performed well but didn’t win. They deserve….

HONORABLE MENTION

As you see on the chart, sometimes we had to include both 2nd and the 3rd place finishers to reach our 6 positive segment goal. Higher income is important, but the results were mixed in 2020. The $50>69K group won but there were also positive performances by the $150>199K and $30>39K groups. In a reversal from last year, CUs with kids spent more unless you were married and your oldest child was under 6. This also included single parents. The only area spending increase came from Rural areas but urban areas with a population of 100>249K also posted an increase. A College Degree is more important in Services Spending than in any other industry segment. In 2020 those with only a High School diploma and those who didn’t finish high school were the only 2 education segments to spend more on Services. Only 21% of all demographic segments spent more on Services so our choices for Honorable Mention were limited.

Summary

For years, Services’ spending slowly but steadily increased. However, the number of outlets offering Services was radically increasing. In 2017, this competitive pressure caused Pet Parents to shop for value and spending fell 1%. In 2018, the abundance of outlets and competitive prices finally had their intended impact. Many more consumers took advantage of the convenience of Pet Services and spending literally took off. In 2019 Consumers held their ground at the new higher level but we saw turmoil similar to 2017. Again, value shopping likely contributed to the small decrease.

2020 brought the pandemic and Services outlets were often deemed nonessential so they were subject to restrictions and closures. Services are definitely needed by some groups. However, for most demographics, Services are a convenience and spending is very discretionary in nature. The reduced availability and the pandemic driven focus on the “needed” segments – Food and Veterinary caused a 20% drop in Services $. High Income is still important in Services spending, but we saw mixed results in 2020. However, the $70K> group still has its highest performance in Services.

Performance is an important measurement. There were 5 categories with high performing big groups, the same as 2019. This is equal to Supplies, but less than Veterinary (6) & Food (8). This indicates a little less disparity in Services Spending.

  1. Income
  2. Higher Education
  3. CU Composition
  4. Race/Ethnicity
  5. # Earners

The Housing category dropped out and was replaced by # of Earners. These changes were caused by the spending again skewing a little younger. The younger crowd is more likely to have all adults in the CU working. They also are more like to rent than own their home. Renters had the only increase in the Housing segment and pushed Homeownership below the 120% marker. While Spending did move a little younger, Gen X and Boomers are still the top 2 spenders.

A radical increase in the number of outlets caused a competitive market which broadened the appeal of Services and drove a record increase in 2018. Value shopping caused a small decrease in 2019 but Services stayed at the new “normal” level. The pandemic changed all that. Outlets closed and people stayed home so DIY became the new trend even in Pet Services. Services did become more demographically balanced, but it was due to the huge drop in spending by those who normally spent the most, not by any big increases. As Retail America recovers from the 2020 pandemic, we assume that many services outlets will re-open. However, to get back to the previous high level of spending, Pet Parents will also have to move away from DIY and back to “I need help with my pet children, and I have the money to pay for it.” Services were hit the hardest by the pandemic in 2020. We’ll see what happens in 2021.

At Last – The “Ultimate” Pet Services Spending Consumer Unit consists of 4 people – a married couple with 2 kids. The oldest child is 6>17. They are White, but not of Hispanic origin. At least one of them has an advanced College Degree. They are 45 to 54 years old and both work in their own business which generates an income of over $200K. They live in a large suburb of a metropolitan area of 2.5>5 MM in the Western U.S. and are still paying off their mortgage.

Petflation 2022 – April Update: +8.1%, 97.6% of National Inflation Rate

Inflation continues to make headlines. There have been year over year increases in the monthly Consumer Price Index (CPI) larger than we have seen in decades. In April the CPI was up 8.3% vs 2021, only down slightly from 8.5% in March. Food at Home (groceries) prices continue to surge, up 10.8% over 2021. March was +10%. These are the only double-digit YOY monthly percentage increases in this category since 1981. As we have seen in recent years, even minor price fluctuations can affect consumer pet spending, especially in the more discretionary pet segments. With that in mind, we will continue to publish monthly reports to track petflation as it evolves in the marketplace.

Total Pet prices were 4.1% higher in December 2021 than in December 2020, while the overall CPI was up 7.0%. In March 2022, Total Petflation was up +7.5% vs 2021 and the overall CPI was +8.5%. The gap significantly narrowed. In April, Petflation was 8.1%, 97.6% of the national rate of 8.3%. Now, the gap is virtually nonexistent. Let’s look a little deeper. This and future reports will include:

  • A rolling 24 month tracking of the CPI for all pet segments and the national CPI. The base number will be pre-pandemic December 2019 in this and future reports, which will facilitate comparisons.
  • Monthly comparisons of 22 vs 21 which will include Pet Segments and relevant Human spending categories. Plus
    1. CPI change from the previous month
    2. Inflation changes for recent years (20>21, 19>20, 18>19)
    3. Total Inflation for the current month in 2022 vs 2019
    4. Average annual Year Over Year inflation rate from 2019 to 2022
  • YTD comparisons
    1. YTD numbers for the monthly comparisons #2>4 above

In our first graph we will track the monthly change in prices for the 24 months from April 2020 to April 2022. We will use December 2019 as a base number in this and future reports so we can track the progress from pre-pandemic times through an eventual recovery. Inflation is a complex issue. This chart is designed to give you a visual image of the flow of pricing. You can see the similarities and differences in patterns between segments and compare them to the overall U.S. CPI. The current numbers plus those from 12 and 24 months earlier are included as are the yr-end numbers for 2020 & 2021.This will give you some key waypoints for comparisons.

The pandemic began in March but hit home in April. Even the national CPI deflated, but not the Services segments. There are 2 different patterns between the Services and the Products segments. Veterinary and Services prices generally inflated after mid-2020, a pattern similar to the overall CPI. Food and Supplies prices generally deflated until late 2021. After that time, inflation took off. In March the rate of increase over the prior month slowed for Services and Supplies but accelerated for Food and Veterinary. In April, Supplies deflated but the others grew. Here are some things to note:

  • U.S. CPI – The inflation rate was below 2% through 2020. It turned up in January 2021 and continued to grow through April 2022. 89% of the overall 12.5% increase since 2019 occurred in the last 16 months.
  • Pet Food – Prices stayed generally below December 2019 levels from April 2020 to September 2021, when they turned up. There was a sharp increase in December. 88% of the 6.7% total has happened since November.
  • Pet Supplies – Remember that Supplies prices were high in December 2019 due to the added tariffs. They had a “deflated” roller coaster ride until mid-2021 when they returned to December 2019 prices and essentially stayed there until 2022 when they turned sharply up reaching a new all-time pricing high in January, beating the 2009 record. They continued to set new price records in February and March, but prices turned down -0.1% in April.
  • Pet Services – Normally inflation is 2+%. Perhaps due to closures, prices increased at a lower rate in 2020. In 2021 consumer demand increased but there were fewer outlets. Inflation grew in 2021 with the biggest lift coming in Jan>Apr. Inflation got even stronger in 2022, slowed a little in March, then turned up again in April
  • Veterinary – Inflation has always been something that you can count on in Veterinary Services. Prices began moving up in March 2020 and grew consistently through the 2021 recovery. Then a pricing surge began in December which pushed them past the overall CPI with total inflation since 2019 reaching +15.5% in April.
  • Total Pet – The blending of the segment patterns made the Pet Industry appear calm compared to the overall market. That ended in December 2021 as prices surged for all segments. In April inflation grew in all but Supplies.

Next, we’ll turn our attention to the Year over Year inflation rate change for the month of April and compare it to last month, last year and to previous years. We’ve added some human categories to put the pet numbers into perspective.

Overall, Prices vs 2021 were up 8.3% vs 2021 with the Grocery increase now hitting 10.8%. There are some small positives. Only 3 of 9 categories had increases over 1% from last month, down from 5 in March…. And Pet Supplies prices actually fell 0.1% from March. There is a little hope.

  • U.S. CPI – Prices are up 0.6% from last month. In March the increase was 1.3%. Inflation was 8.3%. The targeted rate is <2%. We remain 4 times higher than the “target”. Inflation is getting worse, but the increase rate has slowed.
  • Pet Food – Prices are up 1.2% vs March and 7.0% vs April 2021. They are being measured against a deflationary year, but that increase is more than triple the pre-pandemic 2.2% increase from 2018 to 2019.
  • Food at Home – Prices are up 1.3% from March. The increase from 2021 is 10.8%, which is the largest increase in any month since 11.1% in November 1980 and the largest April increase since 12.3% in 1979. Inflation for this category since 2019 is 27% more than the national CPI.
  • Pets & Supplies – Prices fell 0.1% from a record high in March. Current prices go against deflated prices in 2021 but their increase only trails Food at Home, Veterinary and the Total CPI. Note: They have the lowest increase since 2019
  • Veterinary Services – April prices grew 0.8% from March. This pushed them up 9.8% from 2021, trailing only Food at Home, but more than twice their increase in past years. They stayed on top in the increase since 2019, +18.6%.
  • Medical Services – Prices sharply increased at the start of the pandemic in 2020 but then inflation slowed and returned to a more normal rate in 2021. It appears to be turning up again in 2022.
  • Pet Services – Inflation slowed in 2020 but began to grow in 2021 & 2022. Prices are up 1.7% from March and 5.9% from 2021, down slightly from a record 6.5% increase in February, but still about double the rate of 2019 & 2020.
  • Haircuts & Other Personal Services – Prices are +.4% from March and 5.1% from 2021. They are +15.0% since 2019.
  • Total Pet – Inflation is growing and is 3+ times the rate of last year. Veterinary is a big driver but all segments contributed to the +8.1%, which is almost equal to the 8.3% U.S. CPI. Inflation has caused problems in the past by reducing the frequency of purchase in Supplies, Services and Veterinary. Super Premium Food has been generally immune as consumers are used to paying big bucks and it is needed every day. We’ll see if consumers are still willing to pay the higher prices for more discretionary products and services at the same frequency as they did in the past.

Now here’s a look at Year to Date numbers. How does 2022 compare to previous years…so far?

The increase from 2021 to 2022 is the biggest for 7 of 9 categories. The average annual increase since 2019 is over 3% for all but Pet Food & Pet Supplies. This is due to deflation in 2021.

  • U.S. CPI – The current increase is double the average increase from 2019>2022, but over 4 times the average annual increase from 2018>2021. Inflation is a big problem that started recently.
  • Pet Food – Inflation is growing stronger, especially after deflation in 2021.
  • Food at Home – The 2022 YTD inflation beat the U.S. CPI by 15%. You can see the impact of supply chain issues.
  • Pets & Pet Supplies – Despite an April dip, prices are up sharply in 2022. Although the 2021>22 increase is being measured against a deflationary 2021, it is very significant and 2nd to Veterinary in the Pet Industry segments.
  • Veterinary Services – Has the most inflation since 2019 and is the only segment on the chart in which the inflation rate has consistently grown each year throughout the pandemic and recovery. No matter what, just charge more.
  • Medical Services – Prices went up significantly at the beginning of the pandemic, but the rate has slowed since and has now essentially returned to pre-pandemic levels.
  • Pet Services – February was the largest year over year monthly increase in history. The rate slowed in March but turned up again in April. The current YTD increase remains 2nd only to 6.4% in 2009. Demand has grown for Pet Services while the availability has decreased, a formula for inflation.
  • Haircuts & Personal Services – The services segments, essential & non-essential were hit hardest by the pandemic. After a small decrease in March, prices turned up 0.4% in April. The YTD rate is now down slightly from 2020>21 but still 60% more than 2018>19. Consumers are paying 14.7% more than in 2019. This usually reduces the frequency.
  • Total Pet – When we first looked at the pandemic impact on Petflation. We saw basically two different patterns. Prices in the Services segments continued to increase, and the rate accelerated as we moved into 2021. The product segments – Food and Supplies, were on a different path. They generally deflated in 2020 and didn’t return to 2019 levels until mid-year 2021. Food prices began a slow increase, but Supplies remained stable until we neared yearend. In 2022, everything changed as Food and Supplies prices turned sharply up. In April, the inflation rate grew in all segments but Supplies. This pushed the YTD CPI increase vs 2021 for Total Petflation to 6.4%, 80% of the extraordinarily high 8.0% rate in the overall market. It was only 72.5% of the National rate in March.

Inflation is surging in the Pet Market. Will it impact spending? Let’s put it into perspective. The 6.4% YTD increase in Total Pet is far below the 9.6% record set in 2009 but 4 times larger than the 1.5% avg since then. Although pet spending continues to move to higher income groups, the impact of inflation varies by segment. Supplies is the most affected as many categories are price sensitive. Super Premium Food has become widespread because the perceived value has grown. Higher prices just push people to value shop. Veterinary prices have strongly inflated for years, resulting in a reduction in visit frequency. Spending in the Services segment is driven by higher incomes, so inflation is less impactful. Hopefully, Supplies prices will continue to fall but we’ll just have to wait and see the impact of the strong Petflation.

2020 Pet Supplies Spending was $15.16B – Where did it come from…?

Next, we’ll turn our attention to Pets and Supplies. We’ll see definite differences from Pet Food as the spending in the Supplies segment is more discretionary in nature. There are other factors too. Spending can be affected by the spending behavior in other segments, especially Food. Consumers often trade $ between segments. However, the biggest factor is price. Many supplies categories have become commoditized so pricing changes (CPI) can strongly impact Consumers’ buying behavior in this segment. In the 2nd half of 2016, deflation began, and Supplies started a 24 month spending lift, totaling $4.97B. Prices turned up in mid-2018 due to new tariffs and Supplies $ fell a record -$2.98B in 2019. In 2020 prices fell in the Spring but most Supplies weren’t considered a pandemic necessity, so sales continued to drop, -$1.65B.

Let’s see which groups were most responsible for the bulk of Pet Supplies spending in 2020 and the $1.65B decrease. The first chart details the biggest pet supplies spenders for each of 10 demographic categories. It shows their share of CU’s, share of Supplies spending and their spending performance (Share of spending/share of CU’s). The Age group is different from Total Pet and Food. It’s younger, especially from Food. The categories are presented in the order that reflects their share of Total Pet Spending. This highlights the differences in importance. All 10 of the groups have over a 60% market share. The big difference is we only have 5 groups with performance over 120%, down 2 from 2019. That’s the same as Total Pet but 3 less than Pet Food. Higher income and # of Earners are the 2 most important categories but Supplies spending, unlike Pet Food, is becoming a little more balanced across many demographics.

  1. Race/Ethnic – White, not Hispanic (83.3%) down from (84.6%) This large group accounts for the vast majority of spending in every segment. Their share fell and their performance rating was down from 123.4% to 121.8% but they remain #4, in terms of importance in Supplies Spending. Minority groups account for 31.4% of all CUs but spend only 16.7% of Supplies $. This is actually their biggest share of any category. The drop was less severe for lower income Hispanics and African Americans because they are more focused on essential supplies. Asians actually spent more.
  2. # in CU – 2+ people (79.5%) down from (79.8%) Their Supplies performance was 113.3%, down from 114.3%. All CU sizes but 5+ spent less. Double digit decreases by 2 & 3 person CUs drove down the 2+ CU share and performance. However, all groups but 1 person CU’s still performed above 100%.
  3. Housing – Homeowners (77.7%) up from (76.6%) Homeownership is a big factor in pet ownership and spending in all segments. However, due to an increases in CUs, their performance dropped to 118.0%, from 120.1%,. They stayed in 6th place in terms of importance for increased Pet Supplies spending but dropped out of the 120+% Club. Homeowners w/Mtges spent 0.6% more but Renters and Homeowners w/o Mtges had double digit % decreases.
  4. Area – Suburban + Rural (67.1%) down from (68.0%) All areas but Rural spent less. The Suburban drop was so large that we had to add Rural to the big group in order to reach our 60% goal. Even with this positive addition the new group lost a little share and their performance fell to 106.4%, from 106.7% in 2019.
  5. # Earners – “Everyone Works” (72.8%) up from (70.0%) Their performance grew from 119.6% to 127.0% and they moved up from #7 to #2 in importance. In this group, all adults in the CU are employed. Income and now # Earners is very important in Supplies $. The gains were driven by a big lift by working singles, the only group to spend more.
  6. CU Composition – Married Couples (60.0%) down from (60.9%) Their performance also dropped from 124.6% to 123.7% but they stayed 3rd in importance. Only Married Couples with the oldest child 6>17 and Single Parents spent more. The Married group was driven down primarily by a $1.33B decrease in spending by Couples only and those with at least one child over 18.
  7. Income Over $70K (61.1%) down from (62.6%) Although performance fell from 150.8%, to 140.5%, income is still the most important factor in increased Pet Supplies Spending. The $40>49K group spent 24% more and the $150>199K group was +0.6%, the only increases. The $70K> lost ground because they had a bigger decrease than <$70K. A 4% increase in CUs along with the 2020 movement away from discretionary spending has pushed the performance of this high income group in Supplies down to its lowest level for any industry segment.
  8. Age – 25>54 (61.1%) up from (54.5%) This is a new, younger group as a spending lift by the 25>34 yr-olds pushed their spending past that of the 55>64 yr-olds. The performance level increased to 121.8% from 109.5% but the change in range caused the age category to fall from 2nd in importance to a tie for 4th. Supplies $ traditionally skew towards the younger groups. However, the 65>74 yr-olds also spent more so Supplies spending became more balanced across the age groups.
  9. Education – Associates Degree or Higher (67.5%) down from (67.6%) Higher Education lost market share and their performance level decreased from 121.6 to 117.9%, largely because of an increase in the number of CUs. They fell from 5th to 7th  in importance. The only increases came from the opposite ends of the Education spectrum. The less than High School diploma group spent $0.17B more and those with Advanced College Degrees were +$0.28B.
  10. Occupation – All Wage & Salary Earners (68.0%) up from (65.6%) – The performance of this group was 110.7%, up from 107.5%. Only the 2 highest income segments, Mgrs/Professional & Self-Employed spent more. A big drop in spending by Retirees drove up the share and performance of all wage/salary earners in Supplies spending.

Pet Supplies spending skews younger than both Total Pet and Food. The spending decrease continued in the pandemic  as consumers focused on needs rather than the more discretionary Supplies. They often traded $ as the groups with the biggest increases in Food had the biggest decreases in Supplies $. Also, the drop from 7 to 5 groups with 120+% performance indicates reduced disparity between segments.

Now, we’ll look at 2020’s best and worst performing Pet Supplies spending segments in each category.

Almost all of the best and worst performers are those that we would expect. In Pet Supplies spending, there are only 3 that are different from 2019. That is 3 less than Total Pet and 7 less than Pet Food. It is actually the lowest number for any Industry segment. As we move deeper into the data, we will start to see even more differences between the Industry Segments. Changes from 2019 are “boxed”. We should note:

  • Income matters in Supplies spending.
    • The $150K> was group the top performer in all segments but Food, where $100>149K won. However, this highest income group had its lowest performance level in Supplies.
    • All of the 12 winners for best performance were either 1st or 2nd in income of any segment in the category.
  • Region – The West won again and this year was the only region with performance over 100%. The Midwest replaced the South at the bottom. However, spending was more regionally balanced with the lowest performance at 94.8%.
  • CU Composition – Last year’s winner had an oldest child over 18. Spending skewed a little younger this year. Marriage was the “key”. Only Singles and Single Parents performed below 100%.
  • # in CU – 5+ People CUs was the only size to increase Pet Supplies spending so they earned their spot. Once again, only Singles perform below 100% so in Pet Supplies spending, it still just takes 2.

It’s time to “Show you the money”. Here are segments with the biggest $ changes in Pet Supplies Spending.

In 2019, Tarifflation caused a record $2.98B drop in Supplies spending. 2020 brought the pandemic and pet parents focused on “needs” so the more discretionary Supplies segment fell $1.65B. In the chart, there are 7 repeats from 2019 – 2 winners and 5 losers. 2 segments switched from last to first or vice versa. This is far less turmoil than last year when there were only 2 repeats but 9 “flips”. There is another improvement. In 2019 all segments in 9 of 12 categories spent less. In 2020, there was only 1 – Regions. Back in 2017, the good old days, every segment in 10 categories increased spending. In the 1st year of the pandemic the spending decline has slowed but not stopped. Here are the specifics:

  • Age – Only the 25>34 and 65>74 groups spent more.
    • Winner – 25>34 yrs – Pet Supplies Spending: $2.80B; Up $0.62B (+28.3%)               2019: <25 yrs
    • Loser – 55>64 yrs – Pet Supplies Spending: $2.73B; Down -$1.26B (-31.5%)              2019: 35>44 yrs
    • Comment: The 45>64 yr olds spent $1.71B less on Supplies.
  • Occupation – Managers & Professionals flipped from last to first.
    • Winner – Managers & Professionals – Pet Supplies Spending: $5.65B; up +$0.52B (+10.1%)        2019: Blue Collar
    • Loser – Retired – Pet Supplies Spending: $1.90B; Down -$0.56B (-22.7%)                                           2019: Mgrs/Professionals
    • Comment – Only Self-Employed and Managers & Professionals spent more. All other occupational groups and Retirees had double digit percentage decreases and their spending fell at least $0.5B.
  • # in CU – The winner flipped from the smallest CUs to the largest.
    • Winner – 5+ People – Pet Supplies Spending: $2.02B; Up +$0.38B (+23.3%)                              2019: 1 Person
    • Loser – 2 People – Pet Supplies Spending: $5.43B; Down -$0.97B (-15.1%)                                 2019: 2 People
    • Comment: Only 5+ CUs spent more. 2 person CUs stayed at the bottom. Their Supplies spending has fallen $2.5B, -31.5% since 2018. That’s 54% of the total 2018>2020 spending drop for the Supplies Segment.
  • Area Type– Another big change – Rural won this year. Last year it was Center City. Big Suburbs stayed at the bottom.
    • Winner – Rural – Pet Supplies Spending: $1.40B; Up +$0.33B (+30.3%)                                           2019: Center City
    • Loser – Suburbs 2500> – Pet Supplies Spending: $6.59B; Down -$0.85B (-11.4%)                         2019: Suburbs 2500>
    • Comment – In 2019, all segments spent less. In 2020, only Rural Areas spent more.
  • Education – Advanced College Degrees won, a big flip from the 2019 winner – less than High School grads.
    • Winner – Advanced College Degree – Pet Supplies Spending: $4.08B; Up +$0.28B (+7.5%)           2019: < HS Grads
    • Loser – BA/BS Degree – Pet Supplies Spending: $4.52B; Down $0.82B (-15.4%)                                2019: BA/BS Degree
    • Comment – BA/BS Degrees repeated as loser. In 2019, all segments spent less. In 2020, Advanced Degrees and those without a High School diploma spent more. Everyone in between spent less.
  • # Earners – 1 Earner, Single kept their spot at the top.
    • Winner – 1 Earner, Single – Pet Supplies Spending: $2.38B; Up +$0.26B (+12.3%)                  2019: 1 Earner, Single
    • Loser – 2 Earners – Pet Supplies Spending: $6.59B; Down -$0.92B (-12.3%)                              2019: 1 Earner, 2+ CU
    • Comment – Income is a big factor and the # of Earners is becoming more important. In 2020 only 1 Earner, Single CUs spent more. The “Everyone Works” group grew in share and performance because they had a smaller decrease than CUs where not all adults were employed.
  • Income – For the 2nd consecutive year, the winner was below the average CU income level but the gain was small.
    • Winner – $40>49K – Pet Supplies Spending: $1.27B; Up +$0.25B (+24.9%)                               2019: $30>39K
    • Loser – $70 > 99K – Pet Supplies Spending: $2.32B; Down -$0.54B (-19.0%)                              2019: $50>69K
    • Comment – The $100>149K group also spent a little more, +0.01B (+0.6%). Everyone else spent less. The over $70K group continues to generate over 60% of Supplies $. However, the biggest spenders continue to be the biggest losers as their % drop was twice that of the <$70K group.
  • CU Composition – Married Couples Only flipped from 1st to last n 2019. In 2020 they held on to the bottom spot.
    • Winner – Married, Oldest Child 6>17 – Supplies: $2.36B; Up $0.22B (+10.1%)                    2019: Married, + Adults, No Kids
    • Loser – Married, Couple Only – Supplies: $3.70B; Down -$0.80B (-17.8%)                             2019: Married, Couple Only
    • Comment – Single Parents also had a small spending increase. Married Couples Only are definitely the big losers. They account for 24% of Supplies $. Their spending from 2018>2020 is -$2.35B, 51% of Supplies’ Total decrease.
  • Generation – Millennials held their spot at the top for the 3rd consecutive year.
    • Winner – Millennials – Supplies: $4.12B; Up +$0.20B (+5.2%)                                                    2019: Millennials
    • Loser – Baby Boomers – Supplies: $4.41B; Down $1.49B (-25.3%)                                              2019: Gen X
    • Comment – This win by Millennials was driven by the 25>34 group. Gen X turned it around with a small 0.4% increase. All other generations, younger and older, spent less.
  • Housing – The 2nd and last flip as Homeowners w/Mtge moved from last to first.
    • Winner – Homeowner w/Mtge – Supplies: $8.35B; Up +$0.05B (+0.6%)                                2019: Renter
    • Loser – Homeowner w/o Mtge – Supplies: $3.43B; Down -$1.14B (-25.0%)                           2019: Homeowner w/Mtge
    • Comment – Renters also had a double digit % decrease in Supplies $. Some of the $ saved by Homeowners w/o Mtges on Supplies went toward funding their huge increase in Pet Food spending.
  • Race/Ethnic – Asian Americans are truly a surprise winner.
    • Winner – Asian Americans – Supplies: $0.40B; Up +$0.04B (+10.7%)                                     2019: African Americans
    • Loser – White, Not Hispanic – Supplies: $12.63B; Down $1.60B (-11.2%)                               2019: White, Not Hispanic
    • Comment – Although their share of Pet Supplies $ has fallen from 86.3% in 2018 to 83.3%, White, Not Hispanics still drive this discretionary segment. They have the highest % of pet ownership and the second highest income. The interaction of these two factors is very clear in the Racial/Ethnic category. Whites have the most to lose and they did. Asians have the highest income. A 64¢/Month spending increase on Supplies wouldn’t even be noticed.
  • Region – Both the winner and loser are new.
    • Winner – Midwest – Pet Supplies Spending: $3.06B; Down -$0.11B (-3.4%)                            2019: Northeast
    • Loser – West – Pet Supplies Spending: $3.90B; Down -$0.76B (-16.3%)                                     2019: South
    • Comment – In 2018, all regions spent more on Supplies. In 2019 they all spent a lot less. In 2020 the decreases for the Midwest and South were minimal but all Regions again spent less. They were the only Demographic Category in 2020 in which all segments decreased spending on Supplies.

We’ve now seen the winners and losers in Pet Supplies Spending $ for 12 Demographic Categories. In 2020, the pandemic priorities caused the spending decline which began in 2019 to continue. However, things got a little better. In 2019, only 3 of 96 segments had increases and 9 of 12 categories had no segments that spent more on Supplies. In 2020, 18 segments spent more and only 1 category had no segments with an increase. In performance, we saw many expected winners and 10 of 12 were the same as 2019. However, not every good performer can be “the” winner and some of these “hidden” segments should be recognized for their performance. They don’t win an award, but they deserve…

HONORABLE MENTION

In 2019, all numbers from these segments were negative. In 2020, 5 are positive but all merit some recognition in a tough, pandemic year. Most are unexpected and a very eclectic mix. Those without a High School diploma had a good year, including in Pet Supplies. Single Parents are perennial losers. In 2020 they demonstrated that they are also committed to their Pet Children. 2020 was the year of “bosses”, especially self-employed. They spent more in every industry segment and had the largest increase of any occupation in Total Pet Spending. In many categories the Pet Supplies spending leaders were virtual opposites. Age was one of these as the 65>74 yr-olds stood with the 25>34 yr-olds in spending more on Supplies. The high income $150>199K is certainly no surprise. Their increase is truly minimal, but they were the only income segment other than $40>49K group to post an increase in Supplies $. That brings us to Married Couples w/Other Adults but No Kids. They didn’t quite make it to the plus side but were very close. 2020 was a bad year for Pet Supplies. However, it was a slight improvement over 2019.

Summary

While Pet Food spending has shown a definite pattern, Pet Supplies have been on a roller coaster ride since 2009. Many Supplies categories have become commoditized and react strongly to changes in the CPI. Prices go up and spending goes down…and vice versa. Supplies spending has also been reactive to big spending changes in Food. Consumers spend more to upgrade their Food, so they spend less on Supplies – trading dollars. We saw this in 2015. In 2016 the situation reversed. Consumers value shopped for Food and spent some of the “saved” money on Supplies.

That brought us to 2017. Both Supplies and Food prices deflated while the inflation rate in both of the Services segments dropped to lows not seen in recent years. Value was the “word” and it was available across the market. Perhaps the biggest impact was that the upgrade to super premium Food significantly penetrated the market. This could have negatively impacted Supplies Spending, but it didn’t. Supplies’ spending increased in 93% of all demographic segments.

2018 started out as expected with a $1B increase in Supplies and a small lift in Food. Then the government got involved. In July the FDA issued a warning on grain free dog food and spending dropped over $2B. New tariffs were implemented on Supplies and spending flattened out then turned down $0.01B in the 2nd half. Because of shipping timing, the full retail impact of Tariffs was delayed until 2019 when spending fell -$2.98B, affecting 97% of all demographic segments.

Among the demographic categories in which a consumer has some control, Higher Income & Marriage are still very important while Homeownership and Higher Education lost ground. In 2020 Income stayed on top and # of Earners and being a “boss” grew in importance. Supplies Spending also skewed a little younger.

The 2019 decline due to Tarifflation slowed but continued in 2020. 88% of the best/worst performers in 2019 kept their position in 2020. The pandemic caused consumers to focus on needs. That resulted in big spending lifts for Food and Veterinary and big drops in Supplies and Services. Pet Parents traded $. The best illustration of this is that 8 of the 12 segments with the biggest decrease in Supplies $ had the biggest increase in Food and/or Veterinary $. Some good news is that Supplies spending became more balanced. The performance gap between best and worst narrowed by 10.25%.

Prices are still important in Supplies $. They deflated in the spring of 2020 and stayed down until Mid-yr 2021 when they turned up again. We’ll see how this trend impacted spending in the more normal environment of 2021.

Finally – The “Ultimate” Pet Supplies Spending CU consists of 5 people – a married couple, with an oldest child over 18. They are 45>54 yrs old. They are White, but not of Hispanic origin. At least one has an Advanced Degree. Both of them work in their own business and one child just started a part time, after school job. They’re doing well with an income over $200K. They live in a small suburb, adjacent to a big city in the Western U.S. and are still paying off their mortgage.

2020 Pet Food Spending was $36.84B – Where did it come from…?

As we continue to drill ever deeper into the demographic Pet spending data from the US BLS, we have now reached the level of individual Industry segments. We will start with Pet Food, the largest and arguably most influential of all. We have previously noted the trendy nature of Pet Food Spending. In 2018 we broke a pattern which began in 1997 – 2 years up then spending goes flat or turns downward for a year. We expected a small increase in 2018 but what we got was a $2.27B decrease (-7.3%). This was due to the reaction to the unexpected FDA warning on grain free dog food. A pattern of over 20 years was broken by 1 statement. The grain free warning lost some credibility and spending rebounded in 2019, +$2.35B (+7.1%). In 2020 the market was hit by an even bigger outside influence – the pandemic. The impact varied by segment. In Pet Food, it created a wave of panic buying out of fear of shortages, resulting in a $5.65B (18.1%) lift.

First, we’ll see which groups were most responsible for the bulk of Pet Food spending and the $5.65B increase. The first chart details the biggest pet food spenders for each of 10 demographic categories. It shows their share of CU’s, share of pet Food spending and their spending performance (Share of spending/share of CU’s). 3 groups are different from Total Pet – 45>74, < College Grads & the newly created “I’m the Boss” group. The categories are presented in the order that reflects their share of Total Pet Spending. There is one big difference. In 2020 Pet Food spending, older age produced a higher share than higher income. While higher Income performed better in Food, it finished 2nd in importance to being “a boss”. The importance of higher education also plummeted. While Pet ownership is widely spread across demographic segments, in 2020 Pet Food spending was much more targeted in virtually all categories. As you will see in our analysis, that target was older, less educated but still with a high income – younger Baby Boomers. In 2019, Pet Food accounted for 65% of Pet Products $ and 40% of Total Pet. In 2020 the Food share rose to 70.8% in Products and 44.0% of Total Pet. The pandemic caused Pet Parents to focus on “needs” and at the top of that list was Pet Food.

  1. Race/Ethnic – White, not Hispanic (88.8%) – up from 87.0%. This large group accounts for the vast majority of spending in every segment. They gained in share and their performance increased to 129.9% from 126.9%, but this category fell from #4 to #6 in terms of importance in Pet Food Spending demographic characteristics. While Hispanics, African Americans and Asian Americans account for 31.6% of U.S. CU’s, they spend only 11.2% of Pet Food $. This is down from 17% in 2018. African Americans were the only minority to spend more on Pet Food in 2020, +0.5B which generated a $0.06B, lift for all minorities, about 1% of the +$5.6B increase by White, Not Hispanics.
  2. Housing – Homeowners (86.7%) – up from 81.9%. Homeownership is a huge factor in pet ownership and more pet spending. In 2020, homeowners gained allmost 5% in share and their performance grew from 128.5% to 131.7%. However, homeownership fell from 3rd to 5th in terms of importance for increased pet Food spending. It was a great year for Homeowners w/o a mortgage but spending fell for renters and especially for those with a mortgage.
  3. # in CU – 2+ people (82.5%) – up from 80.2%. The share of market for 2+ CU’s is over 80% for Pet Food and Total Pet. Last year they had 80+% in only Pet Food. Their performance grew from 114.9% to 117.5% but their rank fell from 6th to 9th. 5+ CUs were the only segment to increase in number and 4 person CUs drove the lift. Only CUs of 4 or more people performed above 100%. This is a big change from recent years. Singles performance also fell sharply, which helped drive the 2+ group’s increase. In 2020, more people meant more Pet Food spending.
  4. Area – Suburban + Rural (77.8%) up from 75.5%. Their performance grew from 118.6% to 123.4%. (7th) It was a bad year for large Suburbs (2500>) and a great year for Rural. We had to add the Rural and Suburban numbers together to reach our target of 60+%. Areas under 2500 population now account for 18.9% of CUs but 47.6% of Pet Food $.
  5. # Earners – “Everyone Works” (70.7%) – up from 66.4%. This was a big increase from last year and their performance also grew sharply from 113.6% to 123.3%. They only rank 8th but they now are in the 120+% club.
  6. CU Composition – Married Couples (71.1%) – up from 63.0%. They gained in share and their performance grew from 129.0% to 146.6%, but they fell from 2nd to 3rd. Only Married couples with an oldest child over 6 spent more.
  7. Income – Over $70K (65.3%) – up from 60.9%. Their performance rating also grew from 146.9% to 150.2% but they fell from 1st to 2nd in importance. High income is still very important in Pet Food Spending. In fact, the bar was raised in 2020. $100K+ CUs now account for 55% of Pet Food $. In 2019 their share was 42%. The $70>100K group had a bad year and other factors like occupation came to the forefront in the pandemic. Pet ownership is common across all income levels but in 2020 higher income remains critically important in Pet Food Spending.
  8. Age – 45>74 (68.6%) – up from 62.6%. This older group replaced 35>64 yr-olds and their performance grew from 124.3% to 132.2% so the “Age” category ranked #4 in importance. 45>64 is in both groups and 55>64 was the big driver. The change came because the 65>74 share grew from 15.7% to 16.1% while 35>44 fell from 16.0% to 11.9%.
  9. Education – Less than College Grads (57.9%) – up from 50.4%. Higher Education continues to fall in importance in Pet Food Spending as those without a degree gained share and their performance grew from 90.6% to 108.7%. Higher education, specifically a college degree, is now the least important factor in increased Pet Food Spending.
  10. Occupation – I’m the Boss – Mgrs/Profess/Self-Employed (58.5%) – up from 38.7% – Spending by Blue Collar workers and lower level White Collar workers fell while the spending by the “Bosses” took off. Their performance grew from 123.2% to 175.1% and amazingly moved Occupation to the top spot in Pet Food Spending importance.

Only 7 of the big spenders for Pet Food are the same as those for Total Pet and they generally performed better in Food. This is a marked contrast from past years. In 2020, Pet Food Spending grew $5.65B and all 7 of the matching groups gained in both share and performance. Pet Food spending became much less balanced which is best illustrated by the need for 3 new big groups and the fact that the performance of 8 of the groups exceeds 120%.

Now, we’ll look at 2020’s best and worst performing Pet Food spending segments in each category.

Many of the best and worst performers are the ones that we would expect but 2020 produced some surprise winners – <College Grads, Homeowners w/o Mtges, Married, Oldest Child 6>, 4 People CUs, and 1 surprise loser – College Grads. There are 10 that are different from 2019. This is 3 more than last year and 4 more than for Total Pet this year. Changes from 2019 are “boxed”. We should note:

  • Income is important in every segment, but the Food winner makes less than the winner in other segments. However, the Food segment’s influence is so strong that it pushed the Total Pet winner down to $100>149K.
  • Occupation – Service Workers replaced Retirees at the bottom, but you still see the importance of Income in Food.
  • Age – The 55>64 yr olds (high income “Boomers”) returned to the top but the <25 group stayed on the bottom.
  • Education – In 2020, having a College Degree truly did not matter in Pet Food Spending.
  • Housing – Owning a home is always important. In 2020, some of the extra $ available from having a paid off mortgage were used to spend more on Pet Food.
  • CU Composition – Married, Couples Only had won for 5 years in a row. Now, having older kids is more important.
  • CU Size – 2 Person CUs used to be the perennial winner. Last year it was 3 people and in 2020 it moved up to 4.
  • Generation – Boomers remain the best performers in Pet Food, but the youngest replaced the oldest at the bottom.

It’s time to “Show you the money”. Here are segments with the biggest $ changes in Pet Food Spending.

There are just 3 repeats from 2019 so 21 of the 24 segments (88%) are new, including 5 that flipped from 1st to last or vice versa. The winner and loser in Education and Housing are surprising but the biggest trend to note is the size of the increases in the winners. This shows the overall increase in Pet Food spending in 2020 was not widespread like 2019 but rather driven by very specific groups. Here are the specifics:

  • Housing – Homeowners w/Mtges flipped from first to last.
    • Winner – Homeowners w/o Mtge – Food: $17.18B; Up $8.98B (+109.4%)               2019: Homeowners w/Mtge
    • Loser – Homeowners w/Mtge – Food: $14.75B; Down $2.60B (-15.0%)                     2019: Renters
    • Comment – Renters also spent less so the Food increase came solely from Homeowners with a paid off mortgage. However, it wasn’t driven by Retirees. 90% of the increase in Food $ came from those still working.
  • Region – The 2019 winner and loser flipped positions.
    • Winner – Midwest – Pet Food Spending: $15.72B; Up $8.70B (+123.9%)                          2019: South
    • Loser – South – Pet Food Spending: $9.19B; Down $2.84B (-23.6%)                                   2019: Midwest
    • Comment – Last year all regions spent more. This was the 3rd consecutive year in which the spending change, whether up or down, was the same for all regions. In 2020, that pattern changed as only the Midwest and West spent more.
  • Income – The income winner continues to trend down. $100>149K group won. In 2019, it was the $150>199K group.
    • Winner – $100 to $149K – Pet Food Spending: $14.38B; Up $8.46B (+142.9%)                 2019: $150 to $199K
    • Loser – $70 to $100K – Pet Food Spending: $3.75B; Down $2.15B (-36.4%)                        2019: $30 to $39K
    • Comment – Truly a spending rollercoaster: <$40K: +$1.52B;$40>99K:-$3.07B;$100>149K:+$8.46K; $150>199K: -$1.68B;$200K>: +$0.43B.
  • CU Composition – CU’s with Children, especially older children, came to the forefront.
    • Winner – Married, Oldest Child 18> – Food: $11.74B; Up $8.44B (+256.1%)                 2019: Married, Couple Only
    • Loser – 2+ Adults, No Kids – Food: $3.20B; Down $1.55B (-32.6%)                                  2019: Single Parents
    • Comment – In 2019, 85% of the increase came from all adult CUs – Singles & 2+ CUs, married or unmarried – just no kids. In 2020, the spending behavior essentially flipped. Singles again spent more but overall, CUs with kids, including Single Parents, spent $8.81B more while all adult CUs with no kids spent $3.16B less.
  • Occupation – Self-Employed won for the 3rd consecutive year.
    • Winner – Self-Employed– Pet Food Spending: $11.29B; Up $7.91B (+234.2%)                  2019: Self-Employed
  • Loser – Tech, Sales, Clerical – Pet Food Spending: $2.99B; Down $2.52B (-45.8%)                      2019: Retired
    • Comment – Those with more control, Self-Employed, Managers & Professionals and Retirees, spent more. With the exception of Service Workers, who spent 1.8% more, all other occupations, blue and white collar, spent less.
  • # in CU – After 2 straight wins, 3 People CUs was replaced at the top by 4 person CUs.
    • Winner – 4 People – Pet Food Spending: $11.56B; Up $7.61B (+192.8%)                         2019: 3 People
    • Loser – 2 People – Pet Food Spending: $10.77B; Down $2.00B (-15.7%)                          2019: 5+ People
    • Comment: Although Singles again had an increase, the movement to larger CUs continues as 4+ CUs spent $9.3B more. The previously magic “2” number continues to decline.
  • Area Type – In 2020, driven by Rural, the lower population areas continued to spend more.
    • Winner – All Areas <2500 – Pet Food Spending: $17.54B; Up $7.20B (+69.7%)                    2019: Suburbs <2500
    • Loser – Suburbs 2500> – Pet Food Spending: $11.12B; Down $2.11B (-15.9%)                     2019: Center City
    • Comment – Only Cities with a population above 5 million and areas with a population under 2500 spent more. The larger Suburbs, 2500+ people, took the biggest hit, -$2.11B. Their share of Pet Food $ fell from 42% to 30%.
  • Age – The highest income group, 45>54 flipped from the top to the bottom.
    • Winner – 55>64 yrs – Pet Food Spending: $14.63B; Up $7.09B (+94.0%)                                2019: 45>54 yrs
    • Loser – 45>54 yrs – Pet Food Spending: $5.45B; Down $1.63B (-23.1%)                                  2019: <25 yrs
    • Comment: Although the 55>64 yr olds drove almost all of the increase, there was another spending rollercoaster. <25: -$0.37B; 25>34: +$0.87B; 35>54: -$2.24B; 55>74: +$7.41B; 75>: -$0.02B.
  • Generation – Boomers are back on top, while Gen X flipped from 1st to last.
    • Winner – Baby Boomers – Pet Food Spending: $19.31B; Up $6.75B (+53.7%)                        2019: Gen X
    • Loser – Gen X – Pet Food Spending: $8.29B; Down $1.73B (-17.3%)                                          2019: Born <1946
    • Comment – Much of the Pet Food spending lift was an emotional reaction to the pandemic so it is not surprising that Boomers, the 1st pet parents, led the way. Another rollercoaster – Gen Z, Gen X and those born before 1946 all spent less while Millennials and Boomers spent more.
  • Education – Higher education has been becoming less important in Pet Food spending. The trend continues.
    • Winner – <College Grad – Food Spending: $21.33B; Up $5.61B (+35.7%)                             2019: HS Grads
    • Loser – BA/BS Degree – Food Spending: $7.75B; Down $0.40B (-4.9%)                                2019: <HS Grad
    • Comment – Driven by those with an advanced degree, College Grads did spend $0.04B more. However, almost all of the 2020 spending lift came from those without a degree.
  • Race/Ethnic – White, Not Hispanic kept their position at the top.
    • Winner –– White, Not Hispanic – Pet Food Spending: $32.73B; Up $5.58B (+20.6%)           2019: White, Not Hispanic
    • Loser ––- Asians – Pet Food Spending: $0.43B; Down $0.27B (-38.4%)                                    2019: Hispanic
    • Comment – The U.S. is slowly becoming more racially/ethnically diverse but White, Not Hispanic is still by far the biggest spender in every Pet Industry Segment. In 2020 their share of Food spending hit 88.8%, the largest in any segment. African Americans also spent more on Pet Food in 2020, but Asians and Hispanics spent less.
  • # Earners – 2 Earner CUs kept their place at the top and accounted for 94% of the Pet Food Spending lift.
    • Winner –– 2 Earners – Pet Food Spending: $18.28B; Up $5.30B (+40.8%)                               2019: 2 Earners
    • Loser – No Earner, 2+ CU – Pet Food Spending: $2.48B; Down $0.28B (-10.3%)                    2019: 1 Earner, 2+ CU
    • Comment – As we have seen, an income over $100K is important as it occupation. While everyone works CUs now perform above 120%, the real key to increased Pet Food spending is having 2 or more earners.

We’ve now seen the “winners” and “losers” in terms of increase/decrease in Pet Food Spending $ for 12 Demographic Categories. 1n 2019, the rebound lift from the FDA warning was widespread. In 2020, the big spending lift due to the pandemic occurred in very specific segments. Most of America remains firmly committed to high quality Pet Food. However, super premium Food comes with high prices, so income has grown in importance in Pet Food spending. I suspect that the internet and value shopping will become even more important in this segment. We have identified the winning segments in performance and $ increase but they were not alone. Not every good performer can be a winner. Some “hidden” segments should also be recognized for performance. They don’t win an award, but they get…

HONORABLE MENTION

5+ Person CUs came in 2nd to 4 person CUs but this is also representative of the movement in food spending to larger CUs. Single Parents have the lowest performance in the category, but it is improving. African Americans have the lowest income and lowest percentage of pet ownership, but they are still committed to the wellbeing of their Pet Children. In recent years, Millennials have led the way in Pet Food spending trends. Their behavior was then followed by their Boomer parents. In 2020, the situation was reversed as many got on board with the move by the older group. Managers and Professionals have very high income and often lead the way in spending trends, especially in the era of super premium foods. In 2020, they finished second behind the incredible lift by the self-employed group.

Summary

Pet Food has been ruled by trends over the years. The drop in 2018 due to the FDA grain free warning broke a pattern of 2 years up followed by 1 year of flat or declining sales which had been going on since 1997. This trendy nature increased with the first significant move to premium foods in 2004. The Melamine crisis in 2007 intensified the pattern and resulted in a series of “waves” which became a tsunami with the introduction of Super Premium Foods.

The 25 to 34 yr old Millennials were the first to “get on board” with Super Premium in the second half of 2014. In 2015 a substantial portion of consumers began to upgrade to this new trend. The result was a $5.4B spending increase. These consumers were generally more educated, often worked as managers or were self-employed and had higher incomes. One negative was that they often paid for the upgrade by spending less in other segments. In 2016 the anticipated drop in spending happened. The “upgraded” group began value shopping for their new food and found great deals online and in some stores. They spent some of the $3.0B “saved” Food dollars in other segments but not enough to make up for the drop in Food. Total Pet Spending was down $0.46B. In 2017 we were ready for a new “wave”. Thanks to a very price competitive market, what we got was a deeper penetration of Super Premium foods. This group of upgraders was mostly middle-income, not college educated and often Blue-collars workers. Most also were in the 55>64 year old age group. The result was a $4.6B increase but this time there was no trading $ with other segments.

In 2018 we were “due” a small annual increase in Pet Food and spending in the first half was up $0.25B. Then the bottom dropped out as spending fell $2.51B in the second half in reaction to the FDA warning on grain free dog food. It turned out that the big decrease in pet food spending came directly from the groups who had fueled the big 2017 increase. This turmoil was illustrated by the fact that 71% of the demographic groups with the biggest change in Pet Food $ switched from first to last or vice versa from their position in 2017.

That brought us to 2019. The impact of the FDA warning faded as there was little evidence to back it up. Pet Parents either returned to Super Premium or chose even higher priced options. Supplement $ also grew as the health and wellbeing of their Pet Children remained the #1 priority. Pet Food $ grew $2.35B with 75% of demographic segments spending more. Education became less important but income and related categories mattered more. Pet Food Spending became a little less demographically balanced in 2019 and the 2020 Pandemic accelerated this trend. Fear of shortages led to binge buying and a $5.65B increase. This behavior was driven by very specific groups, including 55>64 yr old Boomers, Self-Employed & Managers, Homeowners w/o Mtges, $100>149K incomes and less populated areas. This spending disparity was manifested in the fact that the performance of 8 of 10 big spending groups exceeded 120% while 49% of all segments spent less. The retail market strongly recovered in 2021. We’ll see if/how this impacted Pet Food $.

Finally – 2020’s “Ultimate” Pet Food Spending CU is 4 people – a married couple, with at least 1 child over 18. They are 55>64 years old and White, but not of Hispanic origin. Neither graduated from college but they both work in their own business. They earn $100>$150K but have paid off the mortgage on their house in a rural area in the Midwest.

 

Petflation 2022 – March Update – Inflation Again Grows in All Segments

Inflation continues to make headlines. There have been year over year increases in the monthly Consumer Price Index (CPI) larger than we have seen in decades. In March the CPI was up 8.5% vs 2021, the biggest increase since 1981. Food at Home (groceries) has a similar story. Prices were up 10% over 2021, the biggest increase and the only double-digit percentage increase in any month since 1981. As we have seen in recent years, even minor price fluctuations can affect consumer pet spending, especially in the more discretionary pet segments. With that in mind, we will continue to publish monthly reports to track petflation as it evolves in the marketplace.

Total Pet prices were 4.1% higher in December 2021 than in December 2020, while the overall CPI was up 7.0%. In March 2022, Total Petflation was up +7.5% vs 2021 and the overall CPI was +8.5%. You can see that the gap has significantly narrowed. In December the rate of Petflation was 58.5% of the national number. In March it was 88.2%. This and future reports will include:

  • A rolling 24 month tracking of the CPI for all pet segments and the national CPI. The base number will be pre-pandemic December 2019 in this and future reports, which will facilitate comparisons.
  • Monthly comparisons of 22 vs 21 which will include Pet Segments and relevant Human spending categories. Plus
    1. CPI change from the previous month
    2. Inflation changes for recent years (20>21, 19>20, 18>19)
    3. Total Inflation for the current month in 2022 vs 2019
    4. Average annual Year Over Year inflation rate from 2019 to 2022
  • YTD comparisons
    1. YTD numbers for the monthly comparisons #2>4 above

In our first graph we will track the monthly change in prices for the 24 months from March 2020 to March 2022. We will use December 2019 as a base number in this and future reports so we can track the progress from pre-pandemic times through an eventual recovery. Inflation is a complex issue. This chart is designed to give you a visual image of the flow of pricing. You can see the similarities and differences in patterns between segments and compare them to the overall U.S. CPI. The current numbers plus those from 12 and 24 months earlier are included as are the yr-end numbers for 2020 & 2021.This will give you some key waypoints for comparisons.

The pandemic began in March 2020. At that time, you see that inflation was not an issue. There are 2 distinctly different patterns between the 2 Services segments and the 2 Products segments. Although there are some ups and downs, Veterinary and Services prices generally inflated after mid-2020, a pattern similar to the overall CPI. Food and Supplies prices generally deflated until late 2021. After that time, inflation took off. In March the rate of increase over the prior month slowed for Services and Supplies but accelerated for Food and Veterinary. Here are some things to note:

  • U.S. CPI – The inflation rate was below 2% through 2020. It turned up in January 2021 and continued to grow stronger through March 2022. 88% of the overall 11.9% increase since 2019 occurred in the last 15 months.
  • Pet Food – Prices stayed generally below December 2019 levels from April 2020 to September 2021, when they turned up. There was a sharp increase in December. 86% of the 5.4% total has happened since November.
  • Pet Supplies – Remember that Supplies prices were high in December 2019 due to the added tariffs. They had a “deflated” roller coaster ride until mid-2021 when they returned to December 2019 prices and essentially stayed there until 2022 when they turned sharply up reaching a new all-time pricing high in January, beating the 2009 record. They have continued to set new price records in February and now March.
  • Pet Services – Normally inflation is about 2+%. Perhaps due to closures, prices increased at a lower rate in 2020. In 2021 consumer demand increased but there were fewer outlets. Prices increased strongly in 2021 with the biggest lift coming in January>April. Inflation got even stronger in 2022 but the rate slowed a little in March.
  • Veterinary – Inflation has always been something that you can count on in Veterinary Services. Prices began moving up in March 2020 and grew consistently through the 2021 recovery. Then a pricing surge began in December which pushed them past the overall CPI with total inflation since 2019 reaching +14.6%.
  • Total Pet – The blending of the segment patterns made the Pet Industry appear calm compared to the overall market. That ended in December 2021 as prices surged for all segments. In March, Food & Vet were the drivers.

Next, we’ll turn our attention to the Year over Year inflation rate change for the month of March and compare it to last month, last year and to previous years. We’ve added some human categories to put the pet numbers into perspective.

Overall, Prices vs 2021 were up 8.5% vs 2021 with the Grocery increase now hitting double digits. There are some small positives. Only 5 of 9 categories had price increases over 1% from last month. It was 6 in February. Plus, the price for Haircuts & Other Personal Services was up 4.6% vs 2021 but actually down from February. There is a little hope.

  • U.S. CPI – Prices are up 1.3% from February. The targeted inflation rate is less than 2%. In March, prices were up 8.5%, more than 4 times higher than the “targeted” rate. Overall Inflation is getting worse.
  • Pet Food – Prices are up 2.3% vs February and 5.9% vs March 2021. They are being measured against a deflationary year, but that increase is almost triple the pre-pandemic 2.1% increase from 2018 to 2019.
  • Food at Home – Prices are up 1.5% from February. The increase from 2021 is 10%, which is the largest March increase and the only double digit monthly % increase for any month since 10.3% in March 1981. Inflation for this category since 2019 is still 10+% more than the national CPI.
  • Pets & Supplies – Prices were up 0.6% from their record in February, setting a new record. March prices are being compared to deflated prices in 2021 but the increase only trails Food at Home, Veterinary and the national CPI.
  • Veterinary Services – March prices are up an incredible 3.4% from February. This pushed them up 9.1% from 2021, more than twice the increase in past years. They also took over the top spot in the increase since 2019, +17.9%.
  • Medical Services – Prices sharply increased at the start of the pandemic in March 2020 but then inflation slowed and returned to a more normal rate in 2021 and 2022.
  • Pet Services – Inflation slowed in 2020 but began to grow in 2021 & 2022. Prices are up 0.3% from February and 5% from 2021, slowing slightly from a record 6.5% increase in February, but still above the increase of previous years.
  • Haircuts & Other Personal Services – Prices fell from February but remain higher than usual since 2020.
  • Total Pet – The inflation rate is getting larger and is now 5 times the rate of last year. Food & Veterinary are driving it up as it gets ever closer to the national CPI rate of increase. Inflation has caused problems in the past by reducing the frequency of purchase in Supplies, Services and Veterinary. Super Premium Food has been generally immune as consumers are used to paying big bucks and it is needed every day. We’ll see if consumers are still willing to pay the higher prices for more discretionary products and services at the same frequency as they did in the past.

Now here’s a look at Year to Date numbers. How does 2022 compare to previous years…so far?

The increase from 2021 to 2022 is the biggest for 7 of 9 categories. The average annual increase since 2019 is over 3% for all but Pet Food & Pet Supplies. This is due to deflation in 2021.

  • U.S. CPI – The current increase is double the average increase from 2019>2022, but over 4 times the average annual increase from 2018>2021. Inflation is a big problem that started recently.
  • Pet Food – Inflation is growing stronger, especially after deflation in 2021.
  • Food at Home – The 2022 YTD inflation beat the overall CPI. You can clearly see the impact of supply chain issues.
  • Pets & Pet Supplies – Prices have strongly turned up since the beginning of the year. Although the 2021>22 increase is being measured against a deflationary 2021, it is very significant and the highest of any Pet Industry segment.
  • Veterinary Services – Has the most inflation since 2019 and is the only segment on the chart in which the inflation rate has consistently grown each year throughout the pandemic and recovery. No matter what, just charge more.
  • Medical Services – Prices went up significantly at the beginning of the pandemic, but the rate has slowed since and has now essentially returned to pre-pandemic levels.
  • Pet Services – Inflation slowed a little in March after February’s largest year over year monthly increase in history. However, the current YTD increase remains 2nd only to 6.6% in 2009. Demand has grown for Pet Services while the availability has decreased, a formula for inflation.
  • Haircuts & Personal Services – The services segments, essential and non-essential were hit hardest by the pandemic. Now as consumers move closer to their normal patterns of spending, including value shopping, prices actually fell in March. The YTD inflation is still high but moving closer to a more normal rate.
  • Total Pet – When we first looked at the pandemic impact on Petflation. We saw basically two different patterns. Prices in the Services segments continued to increase, and the rate accelerated as we moved into 2021. The product segments – Food and Supplies, were on a different path. They generally deflated in 2020 and didn’t return to 2019 levels until mid-year 2021. Food prices began a slow increase, but Supplies remained stable until we neared yearend. In 2022, everything changed as Food and Supplies prices turned sharply up. In March, inflation in the 2 largest segments – Food and Veterinary, accelerated while it slowed in Supplies and Services. This pushed the YTD CPI increase vs 2021 for Total Petflation ever closer to the extraordinarily high rates in the overall market.

Inflation is radically increasing in the Pet Market. Will it impact spending? Let’s put it into perspective. The 5.8% YTD increase in Total Pet is far below the 10.3% record set in 2009 but almost 4 times larger than the 1.5% avg since then.

Although pet spending continues to move to higher income groups, the impact of inflation varies by segment. Supplies is the most affected. Many categories are commoditized and very price sensitive. Super Premium Food has become widespread because the perceived value has grown. Higher prices just push people to value shop. Veterinary prices have strongly inflated for years, resulting in a reduction in visit frequency. Spending in the Services segment is driven by higher incomes, so inflation is less impactful. We’ll just have to wait and see the impact of the latest surge in Petflation.

2020 Total Pet Spending was $83.74B – Where did it come from…?

Total Pet Spending in the U.S. was $83.74B in 2020, a $5.31B (6.8%) increase from 2019. These figures and others in this report are calculated from data in the annual Consumer Expenditure Survey conducted by the US BLS. 2020 was a strong year for the industry, on the surface. However, when you look at each segment the pandemic caused considerable turmoil. Pet Food spending spiked as specific groups binge bought early in the year. The high prices of Supplies and the fact that many categories are discretionary, rather than necessary caused their $ to continue falling. Services was hurt the most as many outlets were subject to pandemic related restrictions and closures. Veterinary Services was deemed the other necessary pet expenditure by consumers so their $ surged. 2020 Pet Spending certainly deserves a closer look.

The first question is, “Who is spending most of the $83+ billion dollars?” There are of course multiple answers. We will look at Total Pet Spending in terms of 10 demographic categories. In each category we will identify the group that is responsible for most of the overall spending. Our goal was to find demographic segments in each category that account for 60% or more of the total. To get the finalists, we started with the biggest spending segment then bundled related groups until we reached at or near 60%.

Knowing the specific group within each demographic category that was responsible for generating the bulk of Total Pet $ is the first step in our analysis. Next, we will drill even deeper to show the best and worst performing demographic segments/groups and finally, the segments that generated the biggest dollar gains or losses in 2020.

In the chart that follows, the demographic categories are ranked by Total Pet market share from highest to lowest. We also included their share of total CU’s (Financially Independent Consumer Units) and their performance rating. Performance is their share of market vs their share of CU’s. This is an important number, not just for measuring the impact of a particular demographic group, but also in measuring the importance of the whole demographic category in Spending. All are large groups with a high market share. A performance score of 120+% means that this demographic is extremely important in generating increased Pet Spending. I have highlighted the 5 groups with 120+% performance.

The only group change from 2019 is that Rural was added to Suburban as the bigger Suburbs lost ground in 2020. There were changes in the numbers and rankings and only 5 made the 120%+ club, down from 6 in 2019. Higher Education and 35>64 yr olds dropped out while Everyone Works moved in. Married Couples made the biggest gain in share and performance while All Wage & Salary Earners had the biggest drops. In fact, their share fell below 60% and their performance was less than 100%. Higher Income remains the single most important factor in Total Pet Spending.

  1. Race/Ethnic – White, not Hispanic (87.3%) down from 87.6%. This is the 2nd largest group and has the largest share of Pet Spending. Their performance was essentially stable at 127.6% but they fell from #2 to #3 in terms of importance in Pet Spending demographic characteristics. Although this demographic, along with age, are 2 areas in which the consumers have no control, spending disparities within the group are enhanced by differences in other areas like Income, CU Composition and homeownership. There are also apparently cultural differences which impact Pet Spending. Asian Americans are first in income, education and spending but last in Pet Spending as a percentage of total spending – 0.37% vs a national average of 1.04%.
  2. Housing – Homeowners (83.3%) Controlling your “own space” has long been a key to larger pet families and more pet spending. 2020 was a bad year for renters (-$0.62B) but an even worse year for Homeowners w/Mtges (-$2.1B). Homeowners spent $5.92B more but the group’s performance fell from 127.7% to 126.6% because of more home owning CUs. They dropped from 3rd to 4th place in importance for increased pet spending. The homeownership rate is growing in the younger CUs but most of the pet spending lift in the group is coming from older people who are still working but have paid off their homes.
  3. # in CU – 2+ people (80.3%) up from 78.2%. Singles are now the only group with under 100% performance. In 2020 all CUs with 3 or less people spent less. The 2.1% gain in share and performance increase of 2+ CUs from 112.2% to 114.4% was entirely driven by +$7.7B from 4 person CUs and +$2.7B from the 5+ Person group.
  4. Area – Suburban & Rural (71.6%) Homeownership is high and they have the “space” for pets. The larger suburbs had a bad year so Rural was added to get to 60+% share of pet spending. This pushed performance up to 113.6% from 95.1%. Center City had an increase of $0.68B but their performance is by far the worst at 76.8%
  5. # Earners – “Everyone Works” (70.7%) up from 68.4%. These are CUs of any size where all adults are employed. This group’s share ranking stayed in 5th place. However, their performance increased from 117.0% to 123.0%. They joined the 120%+ club and are now the 5th most important category. CUs with 2 or more earners had a $5.0B increase. This further reinforces the tie between income and increased pet spending.
  6. CU Composition – Married Couples (64.7%) With or without children, two people, committed to each other, is an ideal situation for Pet Parenting. In 2020, they moved up from 10th to 6th in share of spending due entirely to CUs with an oldest child over 6. Those with a child over 18 had an especially good year, +$8.57B. The overall group’s performance skyrocketed from 124.3% to 133.4%, moving them up to 2nd place in importance.
  7. Income – Over $70K (64.3%) They maintained their share but their performance rating fell to 147.9% from 155.0%. However, CU income is still by far the single most important factor in increased Pet Spending. Spending was on a true roller coaster – Under $50K: +$2.98B; $50>100K: -$4.57B; $100>150K: +$8.45B; $150K>:-$1.55B. The key dividing line was $100K. The over $100K group now has 28.5% of CUs but accounts for 51.6% of Total Pet $.
  8. Age – 35>64 (63.2%) There was a clear divide within this group. The 35>54 yr olds spent $3.18B less while the 55>64 yr olds spent $6.36B more. They maintained share but their performance fell from 121.0% to 118.4%. They are now out of the 120+% club and they dropped from 6th to 8th in overall importance.
  9. Education – Associates Degree or Higher (61.3%) down from 68.4%. Higher Education level is usually tied to higher income and Pet spending. It can also be a key factor in recognizing the value in product improvements. 2020 largely threw this history out the window as those with less than a college degree led the way in spending in the necessary segments – Food and Veterinary. However, they did have a minor drop in Services $ and the biggest drop in Supplies $. Overall spending for the Assoc & Higher group fell -$2.33B and their performance fell precipitously from 123.1% to 107.0%, removing them from the 120%+ club. In 2020, Higher Education fell to next to last in importance in Pet Spending.
  10. Occupation – All Wage & Salary Earners (59.2%) – Their share fell sharply from 65.0% to 59.2%. Their drop in performance from 106.5% to 96.3% was even more significant as they are the only big group with performance below 100%. Service workers had a small, $0.3B increase but the overall increase was driven by Self-Employed, +$8.84B and Managers/Professionals, +$3.41B. Every other occupation and Retirees spent less. Low level, white collar workers had the worst year, with a spending decrease of -$3.56B. In 2020, “The Bosses” ruled in Pet Spending!

Total Pet Spending is a sum of the spending in all four industry segments. The “big demographic spenders” listed above are determined by the total pet numbers. The share of spending and performance of these groups varies between segments and in a few cases falls below 60%. We also altered the groups in some segments to better reflect where most of the business is coming from. There is no doubt that the pandemic caused some turmoil in Pet Spending,

The group performance is a very important measure. Any group that exceeds 120% indicates an increased concentration of the business which makes it easier for marketing to target the big spenders. Income over $70K is again the clear winner, but there are other strong performers. High performance also indicates the presence of segments within these categories that are seriously underperforming. These can be identified and targeted for improvement. The low performance by the Wage/Salary earners came as a result of the strong performance of Self-Employed.

Now, let’s drill deeper and look at 2020’s best and worst performing segments in each demographic category

Most of the best and worst performers are just who we would expect and there are only 6 that are different from 2018. Changes from 2019 are “boxed”. We should note:

  • Income is important in Pet Spending, which is shown by the 194.3% performance by the $100>149K> group. There was also a clear dividing line. Over $100K: 181.2%; Under $100K: 67.7%.
  • Occupation – “I’m the Boss” (Self-Employed & Mgrs/Professionals) The only occupations with 100+% performance.
  • Age – The 54>64 yr olds are Boomers that have the highest income and biggest families in their generation.
  • Region – With a strong year from Rural areas, the Midwest replaced the Northeast at the top.
  • CU Composition/Number – The importance of children was maintained, especially older ones and the performance of Married, Couple Only fell again. The “magic” CU number also moved up from 3 to 4.
  • Boomers moved back on top with their emotional binge food buying and Gen Z fell to the bottom – no surprise.

Most expected winners are still doing well. The “new” winners reflect the spending surge from the Boomers. In the next section we’ll look at the segments who literally made the biggest difference in spending in 2020.

We’ll “Show you the money”! This chart details the biggest $ changes in spending from 2019.

Lots of turmoil. There are 24 Winners and Losers. 6 segments held their spot from 2019 while 6 switched from winner to loser or vice versa. Overall, 75% were different from 2019.

  • Area Type – The big suburbs still have the biggest share of Pet $ (38.9%) but they flipped from 1st to last in 2020.
    • Winner – Rural – Pet Spending: $16.09B; Up $9.31B (+137.1%)                          2019: Suburbs 2500>
    • Loser – Suburbs 2500> – Pet Spending: $32.61B; Down -$3.54B (-9.8%)        2019: Center City
    • Comment – Spending in The Rural segment literally exploded. Center City also spent $0.68B more – a big change from their recent pattern. The downside came from the usually reliable Suburbs.
  • Occupation – Tech, Sales, Clerical flipped from 1st to last.
    • Winner –– Self-Employed – Pet Spending: $15.87B; Up $8.84B (+125.9%)                        2019: Tech, Sales, Clerical
    • Loser – Technical, Sales, Clerical – Pet Spending: $9.59B; Down -$3.56B (-27.1%)        2019: Mgrs & Professionals
    • Comment – In 2020 the “Bosses” ruled as Self-Employed & Mgrs/Professionals together spent $12.25B more.
  • Region – The 2019 winner and loser flipped places.
    • Winner – Midwest – Pet Spending: $25.27B; Up $8.65B (+52.0%)                                2019: Northeast
    • Loser – Northeast – Pet Spending: $12.61B; Down -$2.38B (-15.9%)                            2019: Midwest
    • Comment – In 2019 the Northeast had the only increase in Total Pet $. In 2020 they fell to the bottom. The Midwest made a huge comeback, but the West also spent more. They were the only regions to spend more.
  • CU Composition – Having children became more important as Married, Couple Only had another big $ decrease.
    • Winner –– Married, Oldest Child 18> – Pet Spending: $16.858; Up $8.57B (+103.3%)         2019: Singles
    • Loser – Married, Couple Only – Pet Spending: $21.20B; Down -$1.71B (-7.5%)                         2019: Married, Couple Only
    • Comment – Kids matter! Couples with an oldest child over 6 spent more but surprisingly, so did Single Parents.
  • Income – No repeats or flips here but the negative impact of the pandemic on the middle-income group is apparent.
    • Winner – $100 to $149K – Pet Spending: $23.37B; Up $8.45B (+56.6%)                                   2019: $150 to $199K
    • Loser – $70 to $99K – Pet Spending: $10.64B; Down -$3.52B (-24.9%)                                       2019: Under $30K
    • Comment – The $100-149K group had the biggest increase but spending flipped up or down by $50K income groups. <$50K Up; $50>100K Down; $100>150K Up; $150>200K Down; $200K> Up.
  • Housing – Homeowners w/o Mtge kept their spot at the top.
    • Winner – Homeowner w/o Mtge – Pet Spending: $28.81B; Up $8.02B (+38.6%)                   2019: Homeowner w/o Mtge
    • Loser – Homeowner w/Mtge – Pet Spending: $40.96B; Down -$2.10B (-4.9%)                       2019: Renter
    • Comment – Homeowners w/Mtge, the biggest spenders, had the biggest drop, but Renters again spent less.
  • # in CU – 2 People CUs continued their decline and stayed at the bottom.
    • Winner – 4 People – Pet Spending: $17.88B; Up $7.74B (+76.3%)                          2019: 1 Person
    • Loser – 2 People – Pet Spending: $28.43B; Down -$2.57B (-8.3%)                         2019: 2 People
    • Comment: Although 2 people CUs still spend the most, 34.0% of all Pet $, in 2020 the movement was to bigger CUs. 4 People led the way but 5+ Person CUs had the only other increase. 4+ People was the new magic number.
  • Age – A new winner and loser, with the Boomer surge coming to the forefront.
    • Winner – 55>64 yrs – Pet Spending: $24.15B; Up $6.36B (+35.8%)                             2019: 75+ yrs
    • Loser – 35>44 yrs – Pet Spending: $13.29B; Down $1.56B (-10.5%)                             2019: 45>54 yrs
    • Comment: There was another spending rollercoaster in 2020: <25: -$1.06B; 25>34: +$2.56B; 35>54: -$3.1B; 55>74: +$7.38B; 75+: -$0.48B.
  • Generation – The Generations flipped at the top and bottom of the Total Pet spending change ladder.
    • Winner Baby Boomers – Pet Spending: $34.85B; Up $6.11B (+21.3%)                               2019: Gen X
    • Loser – Gen X – Pet Spending: $23.96B; Down -$1.79B (-7.0%)                                               2019: Baby Boomers
    • Comment – Boomer $ spiked in Food & Veterinary while the Gen X growth ended largely due to a drop in Food $.
  • Education – BA/BS stayed at the bottom while those without a College degree took over the top spot.
    • Winner – Less than College Grads – Pet Spending: $39.68B; Up $6.02B (+17.9%)         2019: Adv. College Degree
    • Loser – BA/BS Degree – Pet Spending: $22.56B; Down -$1.26B (-5.3%)                              2019: BA/BS Degree
    • Comment – Largely due to changes in Food spending patterns, Education’s importance declined sharply in 2020.
  • Race/Ethnic – White, Not Hispanics (87.3% of all Pet $) won again.
    • Winner – White, Not Hispanic – Pet Spending: $73.09B; Up $4.36B (+6.3%)               2019: White, Not Hispanic
    • Loser – Asian American – Pet Spending: $1.59B; Up +$0.06B (+3.8%)                            2019: African American
    • Comment – While we had a usual winner, it’s important to note that all groups spent more on their pets in 2020.
  • # Earners – 2 Earners have the biggest share of Pet $ (45.1%) and kept their spot at the top.
    • Winner – 2 Earners – Pet Spending: $37.75B; Up $3.80B (+11.2%)                                  2019: 2 Earners
    • Loser – No Earner, Single – Pet Spending: $4.82B; Down -$1.10B (-18.5%)                  2019: 1 Earner, 2+ CU
    • Comment – While 2+ Earner CUs had the biggest increases, only No Earner, Singles spent less in 2020.

We’ve seen the best overall performers and the “winners” and “losers” in terms of increase/decrease in Total Pet Spending $ for 12 Demographic Categories. Now, here are some segments that didn’t win an award, but they deserve….

HONORABLE MENTION

5 of the 6 are new to the list. Let’s start with Single Parents. They are the group with the most financial pressure. Their spending increase of $0.74B (+48.1%) is quite an accomplishment. Next in line is 5+ Person CU’s. 2020 was a year for bigger CUs. They finished 2nd to 4 Person CUs. 2020 was largely focused on the importance of higher incomes but there were some exceptions. The low income $30>39K group also had a significant increase in spending, +$1.29B (+25.5%). We have already noted that all Racial/Ethnic groups increased spending but African Americans had the only double digit percentage increase at +21.9%. Millennials are the only repeat on the list as their spending increase was 2nd only to the big surge by Boomers. While Self-Employed clearly won the occupational battle, Managers & Professionals finished a strong second and inspired the creation of the “I’m the Boss” grouping.

Summary

To properly review 2020, we must put it into context with recent history. Total Pet Spending reached $78.60B in 2018, a $14.28B, 22.2% increase from 2014. However, it was not a steady rise, Total spending actually fell in 2016 and each segment had at least one down year. There were a number of factors driving both the growth and tumult within the industry. Two big positives were the movement to super premium pet foods and the rapid expansion of the number of outlets offering pet services. On the downside were value shopping, trading $ between segments and outside influences like the FDA dog food warning and tariffs. Pricing, inflation/deflation was also a negative/positive factor in some cases.

In 2019, the industry had another small decrease, -$0.16B (-0.2%) which was largely driven by a huge drop in spending in Supplies caused by Tarifflation. This affected virtually every demographic segment and caused Supplies $ to fall below 2014. Services spending also fell slightly as consumers value shopped. The good news was Pet Food bounced back from the impact of the 2018 FDA warning to reach a new record high. Veterinary $ also increased 2.7%. Unfortunately, this was entirely due to a 4.1% increase in prices. The amount of Vet Services actually decreased.

That brings us to 2020 and the Pandemic. This caused a lot of turmoil. The effect was positive for Food and Veterinary, especially Food. Out of fear of possible shortages, many Pet Parents binge bought Pet Food. Spending also increased considerably in Veterinary, as consumers focused on their Pets’ needs. The more discretionary segments suffered. With continued high prices, Supplies continued their widespread decline. Services had by far the biggest negative impact from the pandemic as many outlets were subject to closures and restrictions.

In the best/worst performing segments, Boomers took back the top spot, but spending moved towards larger 4 Person CU’s and a more rural environment in the Midwest. It was another “booming” year for Boomers.

The biggest $ changes saw more turmoil than in 2019. 6 segments held their position, compared to 9 in 2019, while 6 switched from 1st to last or vice versa, compared to 4 in 2019. Many winners were the “usual suspects” but there were some surprise winners with huge increases: < College Grads, Self-Employed, Rural, 4 Person CUs, Married, w/Child 18>. The 55>64 yr-old Boomers are not a surprise winner. However, a closer examination shows that many surprises have close ties to this group. To better understand this, let’s look closer at the Rural Segment – avg age 56 – 45% H/O w/o Mtge. Farms are in Rural areas and up to 25% of all Self-Employed businesses are non-corp. farms. Farmers avg age is 57. The median income for commercial family farms is $164K. Rural residents are also 50% less likely to be a college grad. Areas with low population have bigger CUs and more pets, but also have less access to retail stores, so they are more likely to fear product shortages. This example illustrates how the surprises can be connected to each other and to more normal winners like the 55>64 yr old Boomers. We will continue our analysis of 2020 Pet $ by drilling down into the individual segments.

But before we go…The Ultimate Total Pet Spending CU in 2020 consists of 4 people – a married couple with a child over 18. They are in the 55 to 64 age range. They are White, but not Hispanic. At least one graduated from college. They both work in their own business and earn $100>149K. They paid off the mortgage on their house located in the rural Midwest

“Petflation” 2022 – February Update – Inflation Surges in All Segments

Inflation continues to make headlines. There have been year over year increases in the monthly Consumer Price Index (CPI) larger than we have seen in decades. Just recently it was announced that Food at Home (groceries) prices were up 8.6% over 2021, the biggest increase since 10.7% in 1981. This month’s huge increase is only in 4th place with 2nd place going to 1979, +13.9% and the top spot going to 1974, +22.3%. By the way, the average interest rate for a 30 year fixed rate mortgage in 1981 was 16.6%. As bad as things look right now, they can get much worse. As we have seen in recent years, even minor price fluctuations can affect consumer pet spending, especially in the more discretionary segments. With that in mind, we will initiate monthly reports to track petflation as it evolves in the marketplace.

Total Pet Products & Services prices were 4.1% higher in December 2021 than in December 2020. That’s high, but still much better than the overall CPI increase of 7.0%. We’ll start tracking 2022 in greater detail. Each report will include:

  • A rolling 24 month tracking of the CPI for all pet segments and the national CPI. The base number will be pre-pandemic December 2019 in this and future reports, which will facilitate comparisons.
  • Monthly comparisons of 22 vs 21 which will include Pet Segments and relevant Human spending categories. Plus
    1. CPI change from the previous month
    2. Inflation changes for recent years (20>21, 19>20, 18>19
    3. Total Inflation for the current month in 2022 vs 2019
    4. Average annual Year Over Year inflation rate from 2019 to 2022
  • YTD comparisons
    1. YTD numbers for the monthly comparisons #2>4 above

In our first graph we will track the monthly change in prices for the 24 months from February 2020 to February 2022. We will use the December 2019 as a base number in this and future reports so we can track the progress from pre-pandemic times through an eventual recovery. Inflation is a complex issue. This chart is designed to give you a visual image of the flow of pricing. You can see the similarities and differences in patterns between segments and compare them to the overall U.S. CPI. The current numbers plus those from 12 and 24 months earlier are included as are the yr-end numbers for 2020 & 2021.This will give you some key waypoints for comparisons.

You immediately see a distinct difference in patterns between the 2 Services segments and the 2 Products segments. While there were some dips and differences, Veterinary and Services prices generally inflated during the whole 2-year period with an accelerated rate in 2021, a pattern similar to the overall CPI. Food and Supplies were generally deflated

below December 2019 prices until mid-year 2021. At that time, Food turned slowly up and Supplies returned to 2019 levels. In December inflation accelerated for all segments but Supplies, which turned sharply up in 2022. In the 1st two months of 2022 inflation rates continue to grow nationally and for all pet segments. Here are some things to note:

  • U.S. CPI – The inflation rate was below 2% through 2020. It turned up in January 2021 and continued to grow stronger through February 2022. 87% of the overall 10.4% increase since 2019 occurred in the last 14 months.
  • Pet Food – Prices stayed generally below December 2019 levels from April 2020 to September 2021, when they turned up. There was a sharp increase in December which has grown larger through February.
  • Pet Supplies – Remember that Supplies prices were high in December 2019 due to the added tariffs. They had a “deflated” roller coaster ride until mid-2021 when they returned to December 2019 prices and essentially stayed there until 2022 when they turned sharply up reaching a new all-time pricing high in January, then again in February, breaking the old record which was set way back in September 2009.
  • Pet Services – A normal inflation rate is about 2+%. Despite or maybe because of closures, price increased at a lower rate in 2020. In 2021 consumer demand increased but there were fewer outlets. Prices increased strongly in 2021 with the biggest lifts coming in the 2nd and 4th In 2022, inflation has grown even stronger.
  • Veterinary – Inflation has always been something that you can count on in Veterinary Services. Prices were flat in February 2020 (amazing) but began moving up in March and grew consistently through the 2021 recovery. A pricing surge that started in December allowed them to beat the overall CPI with an inflation rate of +10.8%.
  • Total Pet – You can see that the blending of the segment patterns made the Pet Industry look very price calm compared to the overall market. That ended in December 2021 as prices surged up in all segments.

Next, we’ll turn our attention to the headlines, which largely focus on the Year over Year inflation rate change for the month. We’ll do a little “catch up” as this report will show comparisons for both January and February. We’re also going to look a little deeper to see how the recent numbers compare to the past, including:

  • Vs last month
  • 21>22
  • 20>21
  • 19>20
  • 18>19
  • Tot 19>22
  • Avg 19>22

We also included some “human” categories that can be compared to a pet segment. First, a look at January!

The inflation rate from January 2021 was large and growing significantly for all pet segments. We should also note that it is getting significantly worse as prices were up over 1% from December for 6 of 9 categories.

  • U.S. CPI – Through the pandemic and early recovery, inflation remained at or near normal levels. In 2021 and now 2022, inflation accelerated, resulting in increases not seen in decades.
  • Pet Food – Inflation is the lowest in this segment and only about 1/3 the rate of human groceries. Note the every other year up/down pattern. Because of the size of the Food segment, you see a similar pattern in Total Pet. The 2.7% lift is small vs 2021 but it is larger because it is going against deflated numbers in 2021.
  • Food at Home – You can see the low pre-pandemic inflation rate (normal) which turned sharply up in the pandemic and continues to accelerate. It is now 10 times higher than “normal”. It is largely being driven by shortages due to supply chain problems.
  • Pet Supplies – Prices surged in January to a new all-time record high. (beating Sept 2009). However, we should put this increase into perspective as it comes vs a period of strong deflation
  • Veterinary – Veterinary inflation had slowed before the pandemic, but it returned to more normal high levels. It is high and growing so much that the increase since 2019 is 27% greater than that of the national CPI.
  • Medical Services – Inflation spiked in 2020 but has returned to a more normal rate, well below Veterinary.
  • Pet Services – With closures and consumers’ DIY attitude in the pandemic, demand slowed as did inflation. That ended in 2021 as prices started up again. In January, the price increase vs 2021 was the biggest of any pet segment.
  • Haircuts & Personal Services – Inflation was consistent pre-pandemic. It has grown about 50% in 2021 and 2022.
  • Total Pet – Pre-pandemic, Total Pet inflation was above the national average. The deflation in the products segments drove the inflation rate for Total Pet down. However, all segments have now turned sharply up so the inflation rate is 4 times higher than it was just 1 year ago.

We have seen that prices increased strongly in January vs December producing year over year numbers that are now concerning in the Pet Industry as well as the overall market. Let’s look at February.

As you can see, a bad situation in January, got even worse in February. Prices vs February 2021 were up 7.9% overall with the Grocery increase being the largest since 1981. Again 6 of 9 categories had price increases over 1% from last month, and the increases were generally larger than the January over December increases.

  • U.S. CPI – Prices are up 0.9% since January. The targeted inflation rate is less than 2%. In February, prices were up 7.9%, basically 4 times higher than the “targeted” rate.
  • Pet Food – Prices are up 1.1% vs January and 3.7% vs February 2021. Granted, they are being measured against a deflationary year, but that increase is more than double the pre-pandemic increase from 2018 to 2019.
  • Food at Home – As we said earlier, the year over year increase in February is the largest since 10.7% in 1981 but only 40% of the 22.3% increase in 1974. Things are bad but could get a lot worse. The inflation for this category since 2019 has now increased 10% more than the national CPI.
  • Pets & Supplies – Prices were up 2.3% from their record in January, setting a new record. February prices are being compared to deflated prices in 2021 but the increase is still high, only trailing Food at Home and the national CPI.
  • Veterinary Services – February 2020 was still pre-pandemic. You can see that inflation then was at more normal levels, about twice the national CPI. It then increased to a new higher level and stayed there. However, in February it fell to 2nd place in the overall increase since 2019 as it now trails Haircuts and Other Personal services.
  • Medical Services – Prices sharply increased in pre-pandemic February 2020 but then inflation slowed and has returned to a more normal rate in 2020. Prices were up 0.4% from January, the smallest increase for any category.
  • Pet Services – While inflation slowed during the pandemic and early recovery, it is spiking now – Up 1.3% from January and 6.5% from 2021, the biggest increase in history and almost triple the rate of the previous 2 years.
  • Haircuts & Other Personal Services – This category is obviously important to consumers and they will pay the price.
  • Total Pet – The inflation rate is getting larger and is now 5 times the rate of last year. Only Food is keeping it down as it gets closer to the national CPI rate of increase. Inflation has caused problems in the past by reducing the frequency of purchase in Supplies, Services and Veterinary. Super Premium Food is generally immune as consumers are used to paying big bucks and it is needed every day. We’ll see if consumers are still willing to pay the higher prices for more discretionary products and services at the same frequency as they did in the past.

Now we’ll use the same chart format to look at Year to Date numbers – what does January + February add up to and how does 2022 compare to previous years…so far?

The strong current increase in inflation seen in January and February is reflected in YTD numbers. The increase from 2021 to 2022 is the biggest for 7 of 9 categories. The average annual increase since 2019 is over 3% for all but Pet Food & Pet Supplies. This is due to deflation in 2021.

  • U.S. CPI – The current increase is double the average increase from 2019>2022, but over 4 times the average increase from 2018>2021. Inflation is a big problem that started recently.
  • Pet Food – Inflation is growing stronger, especially after deflation in 2021.
  • Food at Home – Thanks to February, the 2022 YTD increase in prices surpassed that of the overall CPI. You can clearly see how supply chain issues have grown more impactful on prices.
  • Pets & Pet Supplies – Prices have strongly turned up since the beginning of the year, breaking their all-time record set 13 years earlier. Although this year’s increase is being measured against a deflationary 2021, it is very significant and in 3rd place, trailing only Food at Home and the national CPI.
  • Veterinary Services – This chart clearly shows that the inflation rate has consistently grown each year throughout the pandemic and recovery. Regardless of the circumstances, just charge more.
  • Medical Services – Prices went up significantly just before the pandemic, but the rate has slowed since and is now essentially returned to pre-pandemic levels.
  • Pet Services – February 2022 was the largest year over year monthly increase in history and now has helped produce a YTD increase that is 2nd only to 6.6% in 2009. Demand has grown for Pet Services while the availability has decreased, a formula for inflation.
  • Haircuts & Personal Services – The services segments, essential and non-essential were hit hardest by the pandemic. Now as consumers move closer to their normal patterns of spending, the segment is not prepared so the increased demand is driving prices up at an astounding rate.
  • Total Pet – When we first looked at the pandemic impact on Petflation. We saw basically two different patterns. Prices in the Services segments continued to increase, and the rate accelerated as we moved into 2021. The product segments – Food and Supplies, were on a different path. They generally deflated in 2020 and didn’t return to 2019 levels until mid-year 2021. Food prices began a slow increase, but Supplies remained stable until we neared yearend. In 2022, everything changed as Food and Supplies prices turned sharply up. Supplies had the biggest YTD increase of any segment. This change in Products, in conjunction with the strong inflation rate in both Services segments has pushed Total Petflation ever closer to the extraordinarily high rates in the overall market.

Inflation is radically increasing in the Pet Industry. Will it impact spending? Let’s put it into perspective. The 4.9% YTD increase in Total Pet is far below the 10.3% record set in 2009 but over 3 times larger than the 1.5% average since then.

Although pet spending is increasingly moving to higher income groups, the impact of inflation varies by segment. Supplies has been impacted the most. Many categories are commoditized and very price sensitive. The move to high priced Super Premium Food has become widespread because the perceived value has grown so higher prices just push people to value shop. Veterinary prices have strongly inflated for years. The result has been a reduction in visit frequency. Spending in the Services segment has taken off in recent years, but it is driven by higher incomes because of its convenience so inflation is less impactful. We’ll continue to monitor the situation but we’ll just have to wait and see the impact of the latest surge in Petflation.